1958
DOI: 10.1063/1.1744583
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of the Compressions of Several High Molecular Weight Hydrocarbons

Abstract: Isothermal compressions were measured for thirteen high-purity liquid hydrocarbons and two binary mixtures of liquid hydrocarbons. These hydrocarbons have a molecular weight range of 170 to 351 and included normal paraffins, cycloparaffins, aromatics, and fused ring compounds. The pressure range for these measurements was from atmospheric to as high as 10 000 bars, being limited to lower values for some compounds to avoid possible solidification of the liquid. The volume changes due to pressure were measured a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

8
64
0
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 244 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
8
64
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In [3], for example, various organic liquids were studied at pressures of up to several thousand atmospheres. It was found that for some of these liquids the viscosity increased by two orders of magnitude compared to its value at atmospheric pressure, while compression was only of the order of 10% [2]. Such data suggest that it is reasonable to consider a pressure dependence of the viscosity, even in fluids that can, to a good approximation, be regarded as incompressible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In [3], for example, various organic liquids were studied at pressures of up to several thousand atmospheres. It was found that for some of these liquids the viscosity increased by two orders of magnitude compared to its value at atmospheric pressure, while compression was only of the order of 10% [2]. Such data suggest that it is reasonable to consider a pressure dependence of the viscosity, even in fluids that can, to a good approximation, be regarded as incompressible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…However, at present we are not aware of any experiments of the laminar flow of fluids in which the pressure varies significantly which we could use to compare with our theoretical predictions. In fact, it would be interesting to carry out an experiment to assess the effect of the pressure dependence of viscosity on pipe flows, as we know from other experiments (see discussion that follows where references [4]- [10] as well as [2] are mentioned) that the viscosity does depend on the pressure. This is an interesting open problem from our perspective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a considerable body of experimental literature that indicates without a shadow of doubt the dependence of the viscosity on pressure (see Cutler et al [4], Griest et al [5], Johnson and Cameron [6], Johnson and Tevaarwerk [7], Greenwood [8], Bair and Winer [9]). It has been found that the variation of the viscosity with pressure could even be exponential, with the viscosity varying by several orders of magnitude (see also Szeri [10] for a discussion of the variation of viscosity with pressure in elastohydrodynamics).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bridgman [6] in his book cites a personal communication from Andrade that provides a relationship of the viscosity to the temperature, density and pressure 1 (see also the discussion in [10]). There has been a great deal of experimental data since Bridgman's book that document the variation of viscosity with pressure (see [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22]). In most liquids, while the variation in the viscosity can be of the order of 10 8 (see Bair and Kottke [21]), the variation of the density due to variation in the pressure is of the order of a few percent (see Dowson and Higginson [23], Rajagopal [24]), and thus it would be reasonable to assume that the liquid is incompressible while the visocity varies with the pressure.…”
Section: R a F T (5)mentioning
confidence: 99%