2016
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.2750
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of the damage of reinforced concrete shear walls during the 2010 Chile earthquake

Abstract: SUMMARYReinforced concrete shear wall buildings have shown, in statistical terms, an adequate performance in past seismic events. However, a specific damage pattern was observed in 2010 Chile earthquake in some shear walls located in the lower building stories, usually associated with high axial stresses, lack of transverse reinforcement, and vertical irregularity. Results show that the nature of this failure led to a sudden degradation in strength and stiffness of walls and resulted in very limited ductility.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When gross sections are used for the structural elements (model SR3) the fundamental periods decrease by 33% compared to model SR1. Finally, if rigid diaphragm is also considered (model R3) the fundamental period decreases by 35% compared to model SR1, where periods obtained for the R3 models are equivalent to those obtained by previous studies (Westenenk et al, 2013;Jünemann et al, 2016). The in-plane stiffness of the diaphragm has a minimal effect in the fundamental period of the studied buildings since the periods of models R3 are about 3% smaller than those of models SR3.…”
Section: Effects Of Modeling Assumptionssupporting
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…When gross sections are used for the structural elements (model SR3) the fundamental periods decrease by 33% compared to model SR1. Finally, if rigid diaphragm is also considered (model R3) the fundamental period decreases by 35% compared to model SR1, where periods obtained for the R3 models are equivalent to those obtained by previous studies (Westenenk et al, 2013;Jünemann et al, 2016). The in-plane stiffness of the diaphragm has a minimal effect in the fundamental period of the studied buildings since the periods of models R3 are about 3% smaller than those of models SR3.…”
Section: Effects Of Modeling Assumptionssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…This latter building has few deep beams of 20 by 75 cm and slabs of 15 cm thick. More information about these buildings is available elsewhere (Westenenk et al, 2012;Westenenk et al, 2013;Jünemann et al, 2016).…”
Section: Building Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As stated above, the selected building for this study was previously studied by Kozmidis et al (2014) with only moderate success. The building was also studied using 2D inelastic models of independent damaged walls by Ju¨nemann et al (2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Post earthquake behavior has illustrated that significant damage has still occurred in RCSW due to a lack of confinement pp. 62 Periodicity: Bi-Annually of the concrete core and bulking of the longitudinal steel in edge elements [7]. This may result in deterioration in strength and stiffness, splitting and ultimately wall failure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%