2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.114258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of the drying behaviour and color kinetics of convective drying of yam (Dioscorea hispida) slices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

22
46
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
22
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the trends of the a , b , k 1 and n values with drying temperature were not clear. A similar observation was reported for the drying of yam slices [ 42 ]. Regression analysis was performed to assess the correlation between the predicted and experimental data.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…However, the trends of the a , b , k 1 and n values with drying temperature were not clear. A similar observation was reported for the drying of yam slices [ 42 ]. Regression analysis was performed to assess the correlation between the predicted and experimental data.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The E a of blood-flesh peach was 25.90 kJ/mol, indicating that the energy required to dry 1 mol of water of blood-flesh peach is 25.90 kJ. Our result was similar to the result of yam ( Dioscorea hispida ) (23.53 kJ/mol) dried by a forced convective hot-air drier [ 23 ], lower than that of cucumber pericarp (35.03 and 35.82 kJ/mol) [ 24 ], but larger than that of blanch-assisted water yam ( Dioscorea alata ) (15.5 kJ/mol) [ 25 ]. Previous studies have proved that most agricultural products have different E a values in different drying processes, mainly in the range of 14.42 to 43.26 kJ/mol [ 5 ], and the variability might be caused by differences in raw materials, maturation status, tissue structure, specific surface area, and so on [ 16 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…This is due to an increased heat transfer between the temperature and the samples, which accelerates the movement of water inside them. The findings were consistent with those of other studies (Dhurve et al, 2021; Nguyen et al, 2019; Sahoo et al, 2022; Tarafdar et al, 2021).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%