1998
DOI: 10.1063/1.368625
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of the expansion of a plasma generated by electron-beam evaporation

Abstract: The stationary expansion of an ionized uranium vapor, created in an electron-beam evaporator, is studied in this article. Using an electrostatic probe, the electron temperature, the electron density, and the plasma potential have been measured along the vertical axis in the evaporator. The analysis, made by moving the probe along the vertical axis, first shows that the plasma is thermalized during its expansion in the vacuum chamber and, second, that the plasma density decreases exponentially. The plasma expan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was estimated that at a typical e-beam power of ∼4 kW at 30 kV, each atom is subjected to a high energy electron flux of 0.3 A cm −2 for a beam diameter of ∼7 mm, taking backscattered and secondary yield data from [1]. But the calculated low energy electron flux is found to be ∼3 A cm −2 , taking the atom density of uranium near the source as ∼3 × 10 14 cm −3 corresponding to the source temperature, ionization yield as ∼0.3% (which was measured and is close to typical values reported in [16,17]) and electron temperature the same as the source temperature. Thus, as the high energy electron flux is less by an order of magnitude than the low energy electron flux and its cross section for interaction is also less than that of the low energy group, we have neglected the interaction of high energy electrons.…”
Section: Theorysupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was estimated that at a typical e-beam power of ∼4 kW at 30 kV, each atom is subjected to a high energy electron flux of 0.3 A cm −2 for a beam diameter of ∼7 mm, taking backscattered and secondary yield data from [1]. But the calculated low energy electron flux is found to be ∼3 A cm −2 , taking the atom density of uranium near the source as ∼3 × 10 14 cm −3 corresponding to the source temperature, ionization yield as ∼0.3% (which was measured and is close to typical values reported in [16,17]) and electron temperature the same as the source temperature. Thus, as the high energy electron flux is less by an order of magnitude than the low energy electron flux and its cross section for interaction is also less than that of the low energy group, we have neglected the interaction of high energy electrons.…”
Section: Theorysupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Hence, evapouration from this region is analysed assuming that the density of atoms within the hemisphere of radius r is constant n a0 and it evolves as a point source (obeying the inverse square law) outside this region. If α is the ionization fraction in vapour which is normally ∼0.2% to 0.5% [16,17], the electron density of the plasma generated from vapour will be given by…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…37 For our case it is estimated that the low energy electron flux ͑ϳ3 A/ cm 2 ͒ is an order of magnitude more than the high-energy flux ͑ϳ0.3 A / cm 2 ͒. In region II ͑Fig.…”
Section: B Characteristics Of the U Atomic Beammentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The electron temperature T e of the plasma in the vapour was then calculated from the slope of ln(I e ) versus V p curve in the straight line region when the probe voltage is less than the plasma potential [8,9]. The electron density at the measurement point was calculated using relation [10]:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%