2004
DOI: 10.1143/ptps.154.101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of the Influence of Projectile Breakup on the Fusion Cross Section of6,7Li +12C,59Co

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar comparison has been provided for the elastic scattering of both 7 Li+ 65 Cu and 6 Li+ 65 Cu reactions [13]. The effect of breakup on elastic scattering, stronger for 6 Li as expected, is illustrated by the difference between the one-channel calculations (comparable to the OM calculations [11]) and the full CDCC results.…”
Section: Cdcc Description Of 67 Li+ 59 Co Elastic Scatteringssupporting
confidence: 69%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…A similar comparison has been provided for the elastic scattering of both 7 Li+ 65 Cu and 6 Li+ 65 Cu reactions [13]. The effect of breakup on elastic scattering, stronger for 6 Li as expected, is illustrated by the difference between the one-channel calculations (comparable to the OM calculations [11]) and the full CDCC results.…”
Section: Cdcc Description Of 67 Li+ 59 Co Elastic Scatteringssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Excitation functions for sub-and near-barrier total (complete + incomplete) fusion cross sections measured for the 6,7 Li+ 59 Co reactions [6] were compared to Continuum-Discretized Coupled-Channels (CDCC) calculations [9] indicating only a small enhancement of total fusion for the more weakly bound 6 Li below the Coulomb barrier, with similar cross sections for both reactions at and above the barrier [10]. This result is consistent with the rather low breakup cross sections measured for the 6 Li+ 59 Co reaction even at incident energies larger than the Coulomb barrier [11].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 68%
See 3 more Smart Citations