2019
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz1000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of the long-term evolution of the accretion dynamics of GX 339-4

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We were not able to estimate t r and t h for the 2004, 2008a, and 2010a outbursts since the PCA observations are not available during the rising phase of these outbursts. It is also important to note that a time-lag between t h and t r is expected, and the same has been observed (Yu et al 2004;Aneesha et al 2019) in many outbursting sources. But it is difficult to detect this time-lag for H1743−322 as the outbursts rising time is short (∼10 days), and the closest interval between successive PCA observations are of the order of a day.…”
Section: Modelling the Evolution Of Accretion Parameterssupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We were not able to estimate t r and t h for the 2004, 2008a, and 2010a outbursts since the PCA observations are not available during the rising phase of these outbursts. It is also important to note that a time-lag between t h and t r is expected, and the same has been observed (Yu et al 2004;Aneesha et al 2019) in many outbursting sources. But it is difficult to detect this time-lag for H1743−322 as the outbursts rising time is short (∼10 days), and the closest interval between successive PCA observations are of the order of a day.…”
Section: Modelling the Evolution Of Accretion Parameterssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…GX 339−4 belongs to the first category, whereas H1743−322 is an example of the latter category. Tetarenko et al (2018a,b) fitted the lightcurves of GX 339−4 and estimated the viscosity parameters, whereas Aneesha et al (2019) unified all of the outbursts of GX 339−4 and studied the evolution of accretion parameters using irradiated DIM. Recently, Mondal (2020) determined the lightcurve decay time scale and viscosity parameter of the outbursting XRBs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A good linear relation between the outbursts and the quiescence phases is found from their analysis. A similar long-term variability of the source was also studied by Aneesha et al (2019). In the past two and half decades of the post RXTE era, GX 339-4 showed outbursts of both type-I & II.…”
Section: Discussion and Concluding Remarksmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Similarly, the Swift/XRT spectra are extracted following Radhika et al (2018). The energy spectra thus extracted are modelled using phabs(diskbb+smedge×powerlaw) following Radhika & Nandi (2014) and Aneesha et al (2019). The total flux in 3 − 20 keV corresponding to the best fitting model is used to generate the HID.…”
Section: Spectral Analysis and Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the RXTE era, it has gone into multiple outbursts in , 2002, 2007(Sreehari et al 2019a). We use complete q-diagrams during 2002, 2007(Belloni et al 2005Nandi et al 2012;Aneesha et al 2019) to classify the spectral states with the aid of K-Means clustering algorithm. The EVRs for the parameters considered for all outbursts are tabulated in Table 2.…”
Section: Xte J1859+226: 1999 Outburstmentioning
confidence: 99%