Study of the<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">D</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>π</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>−</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>π</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</

Aitala, E. M.; Amato, S.; Anjos, J. C.; Appel, J. A.; Ashery, D.; Banerjee, Sreeparna; Bediaga, I.; Blaylock, G.; Bracker, S. B.; Burchat, P. R.; Burnstein, R. A.; Carter, Thomas; Carvalho, H. S.; Copty, N.; Cremaldi, L.; Darling, C.; Denisenko, K.; Devmal, S.; Fernández, A.; Fox, G. F.; Gagnon, P.; Göbel, C.; Gounder, K.; Halling, A. M.; Herrera, G.; Hurvits, G.; James, C.; Kasper, P. A.; Kwan, S.; Langs, D. C.; Leslie, J. R.; Lundberg, B.; Magnin, J.; Massafferri, A.; MayTal‐Beck, S.; Meadows, B.; Neto, J. R. T. de Mello; Mihalcea, D.; Milburn, R. H.; Miranda, J. M. De; Napier, A.; Nguyen, A.; D’Oliveira, A.; O’Shaughnessy, K.; Peng, K.C.; Perera, L. P.; Purohit, M. V.; Quinn, B.; Radeztsky, S.; Rafatian, A.; Reay, N. W.; Reidy, J.; Reis, A. C. dos; Rubin, H. A.; Sanders, D. A.; Santha, A.K.S.; Santoro, A. F. S.; Schwartz, A. J.; Sheaff, M.; Sidwell, R. A.; Slaughter, A. J.; Sokoloff, M. D.; Solano, J.; Stanton, N. R.; Stefanski, R. J.; Stenson, K.; Summers, D. J.; Takach, S.; Thorne, K. A.; Tripathi, A.; Watanabe, Shuji; Weiss-Babai, R.; Wiener, J.; Witchey, N.; Wolin, E.; Yang, S.; Yi, Dong-Woo; Yoshida, S.; Zaliznyak, R.; Zhang, C.

doi:10.1103/physrevlett.86.765

Cited by 154 publications

(65 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…On the other hand as shown in figure 2, the phase-shift analysis for the D + → K − π + π + decay from E791 [6,7] and FOCUS [8,9] collaborations, considering the dominance of this isospin channel in the final state interaction of this decay [26], suggest that the magnitude from the model parametrization (2.1), with the structure shown in figure 1 may be possible. The deep minimum observed in figure 2 around 1.53 GeV, is consistent with the zero of |τ 1/2 M 2 Kπ |, as clearly depicted in the figure.…”

Section: Jhep08(2014)135mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…where 6) where the effective range expansion of k cot δ comes from eq. (2.4), and parameters a = −1.00 GeV −1 and r 0 = −1.76 GeV −1 from ref.…”

Section: Jhep08(2014)135mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This channel is chosen for several reasons: it is abundant, being studied by different experiments like E791 [6,7], FOCUS [8,9] and CLEO [10]; it has a dominant S-wave component and a small non-resonant amplitude; it allows the continuously study of the Kπ S-wave amplitude from threshold, at 633 MeV/c 2 , up to 1.7 GeV/c 2 , covering the whole elastic regime. With the D + → K − π + π + decay one can fill the gap of the existing data on Kπ scattering from the LASS experiment [11] (LASS data for the Kπ scattering starts only at 825 MeV/c 2 ).…”

Section: Jhep08(2014)135mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…As we are going to show in detail by calculations of three-body final state interactions in sections 6 and 7, this feature is kept. [6,7] and FOCUS collaboration (full inverted triangles) [8,9].…”

Section: Jhep08(2014)135mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The Dalitz plot analysis of the D + → K − π + π + was performed by different experiments, such as MARK III [13][14][15][16], NA14 [17,18], E691 [19,20], E687 [21,22], E791 [6] and FOCUS [8,9], using different decay models. These decay models differ in the way the S-wave is described: the sum of Breit-Wigners plus a constant nonresonant term, referred…”

Section: Jhep08(2014)135mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Final state interaction in D + → K − π + π + with Kπ I = 1/2 and 3/2 channels

Guimaraes

Lourenço

Paula

et al. 2014

J. High Energ. Phys.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The final state interaction contribution to D + decays is computed for the K − π + π + channel within a light-front relativistic three-body model for the final state interaction. The rescattering process between the kaon and two pions in the decay channel is considered. The off-shell decay amplitude is a solution of a four-dimensional Bethe-Salpeter equation, which is decomposed in a Faddeev form. The projection onto the light-front of the coupled set of integral equations is performed via a quasi-potential approach. The S-wave Kπ interaction is introduced in the resonant isospin 1/2 and the non-resonant isospin 3/2 channels. The numerical solution of the light-front tridimensional inhomogeneous integral equations for the Faddeev components of the decay amplitude is performed perturbatively. The loop-expansion converges fast, and the three-loop contribution can be neglected in respect to the two-loop results for the practical application. The dependence on the model parameters in respect to the input amplitude at the partonic level is exploited and the phase found in the experimental analysis, is fitted with an appropriate choice of the real weights of the isospin components of the partonic amplitude. The data suggests a small mixture of total isospin 5/2 to the dominant 3/2 one. The modulus of the unsymmetrized decay amplitude, which presents a deep valley and a following increase for Kπ masses above 1.5 GeV, is fairly reproduced. This suggests the assignment of the quantum numbers 0 + to the isospin 1/2 K * (1630) resonance.

show abstract

Section: Jhep08(2014)135mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…where 6) where the effective range expansion of k cot δ comes from eq. (2.4), and parameters a = −1.00 GeV −1 and r 0 = −1.76 GeV −1 from ref.…”

Section: Jhep08(2014)135mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Jhep08(2014)135mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Jhep08(2014)135mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Jhep08(2014)135mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Final state interaction in D + → K − π + π + with Kπ I = 1/2 and 3/2 channels

Guimaraes

Lourenço

Paula

et al. 2014

J. High Energ. Phys.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The quark‐level linear σ model

Scadron

Rupp

Delbourgo

2013

Fortschritte der Physik

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This review of the quark‐level linear σ model (QLLσM) is based upon the dynamical realization of the pseudoscalar and scalar mesons as a linear representation of SU(2)× SU(2) chiral symmetry, with the symmetry weakly broken by current quark masses. In its simplest SU(2) incarnation, with two non‐strange quark flavors and three colors, this nonperturbative theory, which can be selfconsistently bootstrapped in loop order, is shown to accurately reproduce a host of low‐energy observables with only one parameter, namely the pion decay constant fπ. Extending the scheme to SU(3) by including the strange quark, equally good results are obtained for many strong, electromagnetic, and weak processes just with two extra constants, viz. fK and <π |Hweak|K>. Links are made with the vector‐meson‐dominance model, the BCS theory of superconductivity, and chiral‐symmetry restoration at high temperature. Finally, these ideas are cautiously generalized to the electroweak sector, including the W, Z, and Higgs bosons, and also to CP violation.

show abstract

The Kπ and ππ S-wave amplitude from D-meson decays

Reis¹

2007

The IVth International Conference on Quarks and Nuclear Physics

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Study of theDs+→π−π+

Cited by 154 publications

References 12 publications

Final state interaction in D + → K − π + π + with Kπ I = 1/2 and 3/2 channels

Final state interaction in D + → K − π + π + with Kπ I = 1/2 and 3/2 channels

The quark‐level linear σ model

The Kπ and ππ S-wave amplitude from D-meson decays

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About