2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2008.07.152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of the pd reaction in the astrophysical energy region using the Hall accelerator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
36
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
36
2
Order By: Relevance
“…1.a of DAACV. NACRE-II used the data from Table 3 in Bystritsky et al [38] (copied in Table IX); the systematic uncertainty, is less than 8%. Unlike DAACV, we do not use the Skopik et al [35] data because the energies are well above the limits of our adopted theoretical model.…”
Section: The Ma Et Al Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1.a of DAACV. NACRE-II used the data from Table 3 in Bystritsky et al [38] (copied in Table IX); the systematic uncertainty, is less than 8%. Unlike DAACV, we do not use the Skopik et al [35] data because the energies are well above the limits of our adopted theoretical model.…”
Section: The Ma Et Al Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For stars similar to the Sun, pp cycle is one of the main sources of energy ~98%. Earlier, we have shown for the first time a significant influence of deuteron channeling in crystalline planes of metal deuterated targets made of titanium on the potential of the electronic screening of a nuclear reaction d(d, n) 3 He [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…We chose the second option, with Marcucci et al [20] [D(p,γ) 3 He] and Arai et al [21] [D(d,n) 3 He and D(d,p) 3 H] as theoretical S -factors, keeping the normalization (α) as a free parameter that has to be determined by comparison with experimental data. The procedure we followed [5] for the D(p,γ) 3 He reaction was i) to select experimental datasets [22][23][24][25] for which systematic uncertainties were provided, ii) determine for each data set, by χ 2 minimization, the normalization factor to be applied to the theoretical S -factor of Marcucci et al [20], iii) add quadratically the systematic uncertainties and iv) perform a weighted average of the normalization factor. We obtained α = 0.9900 ± 0.0368 for this factor, that was subsequently used to scale the Marcucci et al S -factor, and calculate the thermonuclear D(p,γ) 3 He reaction rate and associated uncertainty.…”
Section: LI and D Nucleosynthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2. Ratio of experimental [22][23][24][25], fitted [5,[27][28][29] and new theoretical [30] S -factors to the theoretical one [20]; the horizontal lines correspond to the theoretical S -factor scaled by α ± ∆α [5]. (Systematic uncertainties in the range 4.5-9% are not shown.…”
Section: LI and D Nucleosynthesismentioning
confidence: 99%