2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4972(01)00089-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of the process of organisational learning in software firms in India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The preoccupation with organizational relationships and systems is again evident in the third of the knowledge fields, the SME institutional framework, since it is evident that policy interventions have been targeted at building ‘learning architectures’. Government agencies, however, were not necessarily seen by entrepreneurs and managers as providing relevant or credible advice (Mehra and Dhawan 2003). Rather than get involved in this role directly, the research suggests that governments should encourage peer to peer networks and professional networks (Lagace and Bourgault 2003; Oakey and Cooper 1991).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The preoccupation with organizational relationships and systems is again evident in the third of the knowledge fields, the SME institutional framework, since it is evident that policy interventions have been targeted at building ‘learning architectures’. Government agencies, however, were not necessarily seen by entrepreneurs and managers as providing relevant or credible advice (Mehra and Dhawan 2003). Rather than get involved in this role directly, the research suggests that governments should encourage peer to peer networks and professional networks (Lagace and Bourgault 2003; Oakey and Cooper 1991).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This requires an understanding that necessitates such approaches as: work‐based rather than off‐site learning to emphasize relevance; maintaining an onus on the owner‐manager to direct their own learning; the use of mentors as advisers intimate with business problems; and, finally, the encouragement of peer networks. As to what such architecture consists of, Mehra and Dhawan's (2003) study identifies components which include: a base line of organizational financial ‘health’; the willingness of the management to pursue innovation; an ability to interact with others and so build networks; for the management to be more accepting of risk and an ability to change direction should circumstances demand. As Morrison and Bergin‐Seers (2002) suspect, none of these requires explicit, generic, formal, off‐the‐peg advice.…”
Section: Studies Of Knowledge Use In Smesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Different aspects, such as the role of transnational corporations (Patibandla and Petersen, 2002), organization learning (Mehra and Dhawan, 2003), human capital (Arora and Bagde, 2010) and FDI (Sasidharan and Kathuria, 2011) where the data are diverse and, hence, not amenable to rigid positivistic methodologies. The present paper takes the cue of Altenburg et al (2008) in emphasizing the complex, interactive nature of the innovation process and, hence, the need for a multi-dimensional approach.…”
Section: Existing Literature and Organization Of Papermentioning
confidence: 99%