2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2013.02.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of the pygmy dipole resonance in 94Mo using the coincidence technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This observation is a clear indication for a change of structure in the low-lying E1 strength. The same pattern has been observed in 94 Mo [26], 124 Sn [27,28], and 138 Ba [29]. Figure 2 provides an overview of the data, showing the comparison of the results of the corresponding (α, α γ) and (γ, γ ) experiments for each nucleus.…”
Section: Results From Hadron Scatteringsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…This observation is a clear indication for a change of structure in the low-lying E1 strength. The same pattern has been observed in 94 Mo [26], 124 Sn [27,28], and 138 Ba [29]. Figure 2 provides an overview of the data, showing the comparison of the results of the corresponding (α, α γ) and (γ, γ ) experiments for each nucleus.…”
Section: Results From Hadron Scatteringsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…[2], and recent experimental reports on the isospin content of pygmy dipole states [3][4][5][6] (data compiled in Fig. 1(a)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The results from systematic (D,D'J) studies on different closed neutron-and proton-shell nuclei and the open shell nucleus 94 Mo were quite surprising [23][24][25][26]: whereas the E1 strength below about 6-7 MeV could be populated in both, photon scattering and alpha scattering, the higher lying strength was not excited by the alpha particles. Just from this experimental result the E1 strength below the GDR has to be divided into two groups: One low-lying part below about 6-7 MeV with a strong isoscalar component and a surface-peaked wave function.…”
Section: -P2mentioning
confidence: 99%