1989
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.62.1587
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of the semileptonic decay modeD0Ket al.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The entry others refers to total decay rates measured by Mark-III [1177], E653 [1178,1179], E687 [1180,1181], E691 [1182], BES II [1183,1184] and CLEO II [1185] Expt eters r 1 and r 2 for each individual measurement and for the combination are presented in Table 275. Measurements have been corrected with respect to the original ones using recent values from PDG [327].…”
Section: Combined Results For the D → K ν Channelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The entry others refers to total decay rates measured by Mark-III [1177], E653 [1178,1179], E687 [1180,1181], E691 [1182], BES II [1183,1184] and CLEO II [1185] Expt eters r 1 and r 2 for each individual measurement and for the combination are presented in Table 275. Measurements have been corrected with respect to the original ones using recent values from PDG [327].…”
Section: Combined Results For the D → K ν Channelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Events registered at the Υ (4S) energy corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 7 fb −1 were analyzed by CLEO III [1175]. Fixed target photo-production experiments performed also measurements of the normalized form factor distribution (FOCUS [1176]) and total decay rates (Mark-III [1177], E653 [1178,1179], E687 [1180,1181], E691 [1182], BES II [1183,1184], CLEO II [1185]). In the FOCUS fixed target photo-production experiment, D 0 semimuonic events were obtained from the decay of a D * + , with a kaon or a pion detected.…”
Section: Experimental Techniques and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our approach is different than in [7]- [8], where a pole dominance prescription for the q 2 dependence of the form factors was assumed, as in the data analysis of the semileptonic D 0 → K − [13], D + →K 0 [14] and D + →K * 0 [15], [16]. In contrast, we calculate the form factors directly from our Lagrangian.…”
Section: Form Factors For D → V /Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental data for the semileptonic decays D 0 → K − [13], D + → K 0 [14] and D + →K * 0 [15], [16] are unfortunately not good enough to clearly determine the q 2 dependence of the form factors. Experimentally what is known, apart from the branching ratios, are the form factors at one kinematical point, assuming a pole-type behaviour for all the form factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to understand this result before making predictions for the other yet unmeasured D → P 1 P 2 lν l decay modes. Furthermore, this could also be helpful in understanding of the D → P lν l [2,3] and D → V lν l data [4,5]. Two main issues arise in the description of D meson semileptonic decays.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%