1994
DOI: 10.1149/1.2054740
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of the Structure and Chemical Nature of Porous Si and Siloxene by STM, AFM, XPS, and LIMA

Abstract: In situ scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) and ex situ atomic force microscopy (AFM) were used to examine the surface morphology of anodized p-St(i,00) electrodes in F -containing solutions. In addition to the formation of a mainly pitted and rough surface, in situ STM observation of anisetropic etching of St(100) in dilute (1%) HF showed the formation of well-defined features, such as peninsulas, a 27 ran wide V-groove, and many protruding 5 nm wide micropyramids.High-resolution in situ STM resolved atomic f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the current densities are increased larger pore sizes can be obtained (Figure 1). The root mean square of the surface roughness is in the range 0.3-0.5 nm for porous silicon layers etched at current densities <200 mA/cm 2 , which is in good agreement with a recent study by Yau et al 15 The surface roughness was only determined for samples etched at current densities less than 200 mA/cm 2 because the macropores generated at higher current densities prevent an accurate measurement of this parameter with SFM. 16 The pore radius is approximately exponentially dependent on the current density (Figure 2).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the current densities are increased larger pore sizes can be obtained (Figure 1). The root mean square of the surface roughness is in the range 0.3-0.5 nm for porous silicon layers etched at current densities <200 mA/cm 2 , which is in good agreement with a recent study by Yau et al 15 The surface roughness was only determined for samples etched at current densities less than 200 mA/cm 2 because the macropores generated at higher current densities prevent an accurate measurement of this parameter with SFM. 16 The pore radius is approximately exponentially dependent on the current density (Figure 2).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…As the current densities are increased larger pore sizes can be obtained (Figure ). The root mean square of the surface roughness is in the range 0.3−0.5 nm for porous silicon layers etched at current densities <200 mA/cm 2 , which is in good agreement with a recent study by Yau et al The surface roughness was only determined for samples etched at current densities less than 200 mA/cm 2 because the macropores generated at higher current densities prevent an accurate measurement of this parameter with SFM 1 SFM images of freshly etched porous p-silicon layers etched at different current densities: (A) 1.5 × 1.5 μm 2 image etched at 150 mA/cm 2 ; (B) 5 × 5 μm 2 image etched at 295 mA/cm 2 ; (C) 5 × 5 μm 2 image etched at 370 mA/cm 2 ; (D) 5 × 5 μm 2 image etched at 440 mA/cm 2 ; (E) 5 × 5 μm 2 image etched at 515 mA/cm 2 ; (F) 5 × 5 μm 2 image etched at 600 mA/cm 2 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Survey spectra (shown in Figure S5, Supporting Information) of the sample surface show only peaks attributed to Ag, Si, O, and adventitious C. The Si 2p peak (Figure 3a) is shown to vary significantly with sample depth, consistent with significant changes in the local chemical environment of the Si atoms. At the surface (i.e., sputter time of 0 s), this peak can be fit by components corresponding to Si 0þ , Si 4þ , and an intermediate peak attributable to intermediate oxidation states 37 or SiÀAg interaction, 38 as well as a component for the nearby Ag 4s peak. These results are similar to those obtained in situ on lower temperature growth silicene phases.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4 Allongue et al recently reported a layer-by-layer etching process of n-Si͑111͒ in NaOH solutions at cathodic potentials, showing long range ordered ͑111͒ terraces terminated by monohydride. 7,8 From the practical point of view related to the development of the large scale integrated ͑LSI͒ technology, it is more desirable to have an atomic level understanding of the chemical etching process of Si͑001͒ rather than Si͑111͒ in buffered-HF solutions. On the other hand, chemical etching processes of the Si͑001͒ surface are more complicated than those of Si͑111͒, because the Si͑001͒ surface is expected to be terminated by dihydride in the uppermost layer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potentials reported here are referred to a saturated calomel electrode ͑SCE͒. 8 Apparently, step bunching occurs on the extensively etched Si͑001͒ surface, producing the appearance of stairs with step heights greater than the height of a monolayer. The STM was a Nanoscope III ͑Santa Barbara, CA͒ with a modified electrochemical cell employing two Pt wires as the reference and counter electrodes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%