2017
DOI: 10.5455/ijmsph.2017.0525911052016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of variations in lipid profile in different trimesters of pregnancy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present study fit well with the one reported in oxidation of hydroxy acids by NBSA [16] , NCSA [17] etc., which depicts the validity of a similar mechanism being operative in the probed system as their ∆G # values are quite high (87.35 to 87.67 kJ mol -1 ). By and large ∆H # (52.42 to 56.50 kJ mol -1 ) values also show a similar trend.…”
Section: Mechanismsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The present study fit well with the one reported in oxidation of hydroxy acids by NBSA [16] , NCSA [17] etc., which depicts the validity of a similar mechanism being operative in the probed system as their ∆G # values are quite high (87.35 to 87.67 kJ mol -1 ). By and large ∆H # (52.42 to 56.50 kJ mol -1 ) values also show a similar trend.…”
Section: Mechanismsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This could be attributed to different sample size and time of sampling for lipid profile measurement. LDL-C was higher among cases when compared to controls [102.22 ± 14.21 vs 68.35 ± 15.41 respectively], the results were previously reported by Mishra et al [21] Kandimalla et al [22] concluded that LDL-C measurements were established to be significantly elevated in the women with PET.…”
Section: Disucssionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…For LDL-C (mg/dl), another similar study reports 114.1±20.2; 132.6±21.6; 154.3±25.2 in 1 st , 2 nd and 3 rd trimester respectively and in control 103.1±19.2 [9]. The mean LDL-C was estimated as 84.4±11.2; 109±12.3; 138±12.7 with advanced pregnancy and in control as 88.3±11.1 as depicted in other similar case control study [2] which is in agreement with current findings. Pusukuru et al, estimated the mean LDL-C levels in second and third trimester were 92.41±18.94 mg/dl and 137.82±13.45 mg/dl respectively [60] which follows the increasing pattern comparable to our study .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The elevation in TC is attributed to formation of zygote in the wall of the uterus [2]. One group of researchers finding demonstrates that a mother's serum cholesterol concentrations rise by approximately 50-70% during pregnancy compared to normal concentrations [63].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation