2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2010.06.221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on a focusing, low-background neutron delivery system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here one uses a convergent beam covering a large angular range instead of a collimated beam by using an 4 m long elliptically focusing guide element. This essentially increases the intensity by a factor of 10 in the TOF mode [12]. A resolution of 2 mm was obtained using a position sensitive detector (PSD) positioned about 3 m behind the sample to detect the neutrons.…”
Section: Samples and Characterizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here one uses a convergent beam covering a large angular range instead of a collimated beam by using an 4 m long elliptically focusing guide element. This essentially increases the intensity by a factor of 10 in the TOF mode [12]. A resolution of 2 mm was obtained using a position sensitive detector (PSD) positioned about 3 m behind the sample to detect the neutrons.…”
Section: Samples and Characterizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 7 shows the polarized neutron intensity profiles along Q z and their fits for S1 (grown on STO (001)) and S2 (grown on STO (110)) after cooling the sample in a saturating field of +5.0 kOe and measuring at +5.0 kOe and at 15 K. The measurements were done using the Selene setup 16 .
Figure 7PNR measurements of specimens S1 and S2. Specular neutron reflectivity patterns (solid symbols) along with their best fits (open symbols) as a function of Q z for the NSF [R − (black) and R + (red)] channels measured at a saturation field H a  = +5.0 kOe at 15 K for the sample ( a ) S1 along the [110] direction and the sample ( b ) S2 along the [001] direction.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Longer guides improve the homogeneity of the focused beam [2]. Similar concepts can be applied to Montel optics using parabolic or elliptic mirrors yielding the additional benefit of a very homogeneous phase space [6] and allowing even more bulky sample environments. The presented focusing system installed on a mechanical support with provision for a highly reproducible positioning using kinematic mounts allows a very efficient, swift, and cost-effective conditioning of neutron beams at beamlines for diffraction, spectroscopy, imaging, and irradiation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the rather dramatic increase of the reflection angles of supermirrors exceeding m = 8 times the critical angle of reflection of Ni [5], neutrons encompassing a wide range of wavelengths and large divergence can be directed towards the sample position. While adjusting the beam size at the sample with Montel mirrors [6] is straightforward using an aperture at the focal point at the entrance of the mirror [6], the selection of the beam size using elliptic or parabolic guides is more complicated and essentially given by the design of the optics [7]. In the following we propose a combination of a focusing parabolic guide with a variable collimation stage in front of the entrance of the guide that allows varying the size of the beam spot at the sample position in the horizontal and…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%