2003
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9453(2003)129:2(85)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on Accuracy of 1-Degree DEM Versus Topographic Complexity Using GIS Zonal Analysis

Abstract: Zonal analysis in geographic information systems is a useful and convenient tool to study the accuracy of the digital elevation model ͑DEM͒ in terms of topographic complexity, which is defined in this paper as the change in terrain slope or slope change. The accuracy of the U.S. Geological Survey 1-degree DEM over two test areas is studied by comparing it with the USGS 7.5-min DEM. The statistical quantities of the DEM errors are studied and modeled using various mathematical functions. It is shown that the st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This includes source, size and spatial structure of error associated with different DEM production techniques. Examples of studies that have evaluated the accuracy of various DEM products are: DEMs produced from synthetic aperture radar (SAR) (Wang and Trinder, 1999), the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) (Miliaresis and Paraschou, 2005;Suna et al, 2003), USGS DEMs (Berry et al, 2000;Shan et al, 2003), and comparisons of various DEM production methods (Li, 1994). While methods to assess and reduce DEM error have been developed (Hengl et al, 2004;Li, 1991;Lopez, 2002), errors persist.…”
Section: Quantifying Dem Errormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This includes source, size and spatial structure of error associated with different DEM production techniques. Examples of studies that have evaluated the accuracy of various DEM products are: DEMs produced from synthetic aperture radar (SAR) (Wang and Trinder, 1999), the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) (Miliaresis and Paraschou, 2005;Suna et al, 2003), USGS DEMs (Berry et al, 2000;Shan et al, 2003), and comparisons of various DEM production methods (Li, 1994). While methods to assess and reduce DEM error have been developed (Hengl et al, 2004;Li, 1991;Lopez, 2002), errors persist.…”
Section: Quantifying Dem Errormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Raster zonal statistics, for example, have been used to summarize raster data of forest products, agricultural goods, and tourism services in order to assess the economic worth of regions [56]. Raster zonal statistics is also a significant approach for summarizing raster values over a watershed to extract hydrological characteristics [57] and a valuable tool for evaluating the quality of DEM (Digital Elevation Model) data [58]. By integrating imagery of various bands and deleting mixed pixels, zonal statistics have also been utilized to increase the quality of land use and land cover (LULC) classification [59].…”
Section: Zonal Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies have evaluated error and accuracy of various DEM products. These include DEMs produced from synthetic aperture radar (SAR) (Wang and Trinder, 1999), the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) (Suna et al, 2003;Miliaresis and Paraschou, 2005), USGS DEMs (Berry et al, 2000;Shan et al, 2003), and comparisons of various DEM production methods (Li, 1994). Methods to assess and reduce DEM error have been developed (Li, 1991;Lopez, 2002;Hengl et al, 2004).…”
Section: Egumentioning
confidence: 99%