2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.126748
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on anaerobic co-digestion of municipal sewage sludge and fruit and vegetable wastes: Methane production, microbial community and three-dimension fluorescence excitation-emission matrix analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Out of 326 studies, 65 were obtained after screening, yielding 432 relevant AcoD data sets for meta-analysis and modeling, grouped according to their mono-digestion control, including the: (1) AM compared to AcoD of ruminant manure AM(RM):LB, pig manure AM(PM):LB, chicken manure AM(CM):LB, AM:FW, , AM:slaughterhouse waste (SL), , AM:desugared molasses (MO), and AM:algae (AL); (2) LB mono-digestion compared to LB:AM(RM), ,,, LB:AM(PM), , LB:AM(CM), ,,, LB:FW, , LB:MO, and LB:SS; (3) SS mono-digestion to SS:fats, oils, grease (FOG), SS:FW, SS:AL, SS:LB, , SS:high-carbon liquid substrate (L-C), and SS:glycerin (Gly); and (4) FW mono-digestion compared to FW:AM, ,, FW:LB, ,, FW:SS, ,,,,, FW:high-nitrogen liquid substrate (L-N); as well as additional data sets ,…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Out of 326 studies, 65 were obtained after screening, yielding 432 relevant AcoD data sets for meta-analysis and modeling, grouped according to their mono-digestion control, including the: (1) AM compared to AcoD of ruminant manure AM(RM):LB, pig manure AM(PM):LB, chicken manure AM(CM):LB, AM:FW, , AM:slaughterhouse waste (SL), , AM:desugared molasses (MO), and AM:algae (AL); (2) LB mono-digestion compared to LB:AM(RM), ,,, LB:AM(PM), , LB:AM(CM), ,,, LB:FW, , LB:MO, and LB:SS; (3) SS mono-digestion to SS:fats, oils, grease (FOG), SS:FW, SS:AL, SS:LB, , SS:high-carbon liquid substrate (L-C), and SS:glycerin (Gly); and (4) FW mono-digestion compared to FW:AM, ,, FW:LB, ,, FW:SS, ,,,,, FW:high-nitrogen liquid substrate (L-N); as well as additional data sets ,…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Producing and collecting CH 4 from SWS reduces water pollution and CH 4 emissions to the atmosphere ( Jiang et al, 2022 ), meanwhile using this renewable source of energy contributes to saving environmental resources ( Deng et al, 2022 ). However, the application of this approach in an industrial scale requires evaluation of biomass production and conversion systems, including feedstock selection and growth; harvest; storage conditions; bio-gasification; gas cleaning; gas use and residue processing ( Volschan Junior, de Almeida & Cammarota, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, previous experiences demonstrated poor digestion efficiency with low methane yields, especially observed in single-stage systems, due to the lack of nutrients and trace elements in these wastes [2][3][4]. To increase methane production and improve anaerobic digestion stability, vegetable wastes can be co-digested with materials abundant in nutrients, minerals, and metals, including sewage sludge [5,6], organic fraction of municipal solid waste [7], and fish and abattoir waste [5]. The addition of co-substrates of animal and municipal origin reduces the effect of acidification observed during VW mono-digestion and keeps volatile solids concentration more balanced; however, at the same time, it requires a continual supply of these substrates to the digestion process [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%