Study on Automatic Multi-Classification of Spine Based on Deep Learning and Postoperative Infection Screening

Abstract

The preoperative qualitative and hierarchical diagnosis of intervertebral foramen stenosis is very important for clinicians to explore the effect of multimodal analgesia nursing on pain control after spinal fusion and to formulate treatment strategies and patients’ health recovery. However, there are still many problems in this aspect, and there is a lack of relevant research and effective methods to assist clinicians in diagnosis. Therefore, to improve the accuracy of computer-aided diagnosis of intervertebral foramen stenosis and the work efficiency of doctors, a deep learning automatic grading algorithm of intervertebral foramen stenosis image is proposed in this study. The image of intervertebral foramen was extracted from the MRI image of sagittal spine, and the image was preprocessed. 86 patients with spinal fusion treated in our hospital, specifically from May 2018 to May 2020, were randomly divided into the control group (routine analgesic nursing) and the multimodal group (multimodal analgesic nursing), with 43 cases in each group. The pain control effect and satisfaction of the two groups were observed. The results after multimodal analgesia nursing show that the VASs of the multimodal group at different time points were significantly lower than those of the control group P < 0.05 ; the satisfaction score of pain control in the multimodal group was significantly higher than that in the control group P < 0.05 . Multimodal analgesia nursing for patients undergoing spinal fusion can effectively reduce the degree of postoperative pain and improve the effect of pain control and satisfaction with pain control, which is worthy of promotion.

Retracted: Study on Automatic Multi‐Classification of Spine Based on Deep Learning and Postoperative Infection Screening

“…Tis article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [1]. Tis investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process:…”

“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [ 1 ]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process: Discrepancies in scope Discrepancies in the description of the research reported Discrepancies between the availability of data and the research described Inappropriate citations Incoherent, meaningless and/or irrelevant content included in the article Peer-review manipulation …”