2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2021.105183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on Cu-Fe/CeO2 bimetallic catalyst for reverse water gas shift reaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fe-based materials were often applied as promoter to improve the thermal stability and catalytic activity of RWGS catalysts. 8,11,30,[33][34][35] On the one hand, the Fe-base promoter exhibits much better dispersity than the active phase of Cu (which can be evidenced by the characterization of TEM and elemental mapping of CuO x &FeO y /MAO, Fig. 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Fe-based materials were often applied as promoter to improve the thermal stability and catalytic activity of RWGS catalysts. 8,11,30,[33][34][35] On the one hand, the Fe-base promoter exhibits much better dispersity than the active phase of Cu (which can be evidenced by the characterization of TEM and elemental mapping of CuO x &FeO y /MAO, Fig. 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…7 As summarized in Table 1, the CO selectivity of Cu-based catalyst is close to 100%. [8][9][10][11] Hydrocarbons such as CH 4 is nearly impossible to form, 7,12 even under H 2 -rich condition (H 2 > 99 vol.%). 13 The RWGS reaction is mildly endothermic ( =42.1 kJ mol −1 ) 3 , 𝐻 ⊖ 298 the higher reaction temperature is beneficial for promoting the catalytic efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…FeCu/CeO 2 was 100% selective to CO and improved the catalytic stability . Fe/CeO 2 doped with 0.1 g g –1 Cu and 0.05 g g –1 Fe reached theoretical CO 2 conversion at 750 °C, and no carbon was detected on the surface . XRD indicated that Cu + was oxidized to Cu 2+ after the reaction, while the low amount of Fe was undetected.…”
Section: The Role Of Support Materialsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…65 Fe/ CeO 2 doped with 0.1 g g −1 Cu and 0.05 g g −1 Fe reached theoretical CO 2 conversion at 750 °C, and no carbon was detected on the surface. 157 XRD indicated that Cu + was oxidized to Cu 2+ after the reaction, while the low amount of Fe was undetected. A 50% Fe 2 O 3 /CuO on CeO 2 /Al 2 O 3 support with a Fe/Cu ratio of 0.25:0.75 converted CO 2 at 50% with a CO selectivity of >98% for >40 h at 450 °C and a H 2 /CO 2 ratio of 4:1.…”
Section: The Role Of Support Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%