2006
DOI: 10.2172/895663
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on degradation of a commercial rigid polyurethane foam used for fillingof process gas equipment.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is however, interesting to note that, while commercial PU foams in the similar density domain (49.6 kg/m 3 ) have been reported to have mean compressive strength of 0.21 MPa (31 psi); the biofoams and biofoam composites developed in this study registered average compressive strengths of 1.59 MPa at 55 kg/m 3 and 2.13 MPa at 59.6 kg/m 3 . The comprehensive study carried out at Oak Ridge National Laboratory in 2006, reported that even at much higher density (112.1 kg/m 3 ), the commercial PU foams demonstrated compressive strength of 2.07 MPa . Another recent study on mechanical performance of commercial PU foam reported that at a foam density of 80 kg/m 3 , the mean compressive strength was 0.60 MPa, lower than the strengths obtained in our study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…It is however, interesting to note that, while commercial PU foams in the similar density domain (49.6 kg/m 3 ) have been reported to have mean compressive strength of 0.21 MPa (31 psi); the biofoams and biofoam composites developed in this study registered average compressive strengths of 1.59 MPa at 55 kg/m 3 and 2.13 MPa at 59.6 kg/m 3 . The comprehensive study carried out at Oak Ridge National Laboratory in 2006, reported that even at much higher density (112.1 kg/m 3 ), the commercial PU foams demonstrated compressive strength of 2.07 MPa . Another recent study on mechanical performance of commercial PU foam reported that at a foam density of 80 kg/m 3 , the mean compressive strength was 0.60 MPa, lower than the strengths obtained in our study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…From these results, it can be concluded that there is no biodeterioration of PU foam due to microbial activity in the accelerated shortterm reactors under anaerobic conditions. Furthermore, based on the detailed investigations on aging behavior of PU foam (details not shown), the tested PU material was also mechanically and physically stable when exposed to extreme degradation conditions [21]. Those results can be summarized as follows: (1) No thermal aging characterized by compressive strengths' changes was observed at 90 C for 60-day period in both air and water environments.…”
Section: Accelerated Bioreactor Studiesmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The measured mean annual earth temperature for Tennessee soil at 90 ft depth where PU will be used as a barrier material was around 13 C [21]. The temperature increase in the landfill designed for the disposal of pipes and equipments contaminated with radionuclides is not likely to be as much as landfills designed for the disposal of municipal waste rich in organic nutrients.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Landfill Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to lightweight of both materials, it is very suitable to combat ground settlement problem [13]. Several reports have appeared in the literature on the susceptibility of PU to fungal attack [14][15][16][17][18]. These studies revealed that polyether PU is moderately resistant to fungal and microbial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%