2014
DOI: 10.5762/kais.2014.15.9.5675
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on Detection of Oral Bacteria in the Saliva and Risk Factors of Adults

Abstract: As oral diseases are developed by mixed infections, not by any single element, an accurate analysis of the causative microorganisms related to dental caries and periodontal diseases is required. In this study, saliva was collected from selected adults to determine if the bacteria that are well known as the causative microorganisms of dental caries and periodontal diseases would be detected in their saliva. In addition, this study examined whether there would be any differences among adults according to age, sm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous studies the caries causing bacteria in the oral environment were approximately worse in smokers due to S.mutans distribution being dominant [14,[17][18]. it was that S.mutans where three times higher in smokers [15]. The results showed a higher risk than previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In previous studies the caries causing bacteria in the oral environment were approximately worse in smokers due to S.mutans distribution being dominant [14,[17][18]. it was that S.mutans where three times higher in smokers [15]. The results showed a higher risk than previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…intermedia and S. mutans are two common observed bacterial strains [13]. Thus far, most investigations have focused on associations between oral diseases and smoking status [14][15], relationships between salivation and oral diseases [1,[3][4][5][6]16], as well as periodontal diseases and oral bacteria in contexts of disease causing oral bacteria [1,[9][10][11]. Further, even though there are studies investigating with regards to relationship between oral bacteria and respective oral disease types, no study have utilized saliva as a diagnostic tool for oral inflammatory diseases including dental caries, periodontal disease, and gingivitis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Saliva is not only necessary to maintain the normal function of oral tissues, but also to suppress oral disease occurrence, and if salivary secretion decreases below normal levels, it can cause oral mucosal diseases and oral diseases. When salivation is lowered, salivary buffering capacity and saliva pH are lowered, and this can significantly cause and increase dental caries [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dental diseases are largely classi ed into dental caries and periodontal diseases, both of which are caused by microbial infection. Among more than 500 kinds of bacteria present in the oral cavity, the microbe that is most closely related to dental caries is Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans), a decisive causative agent that induces tooth decay by damaging the hard structure of the teeth [20][21][22]. Also, Prevotella intermedia (P. intermedia), one of the major pathogens of periodontal disease, is known to be a powerful causative agent of adult periodontitis, pregnancy gingivitis, and ulcerative gingivitis, and it has been reported to be found in oral lesions [23,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, P. intermedia among oral microbes decreased as the amount of water intake increased [25]. In the study of Hong [26], it was reported that less P. intermedia causing periodontal disease was detected in the group drinking 3 to 4 glasses of water per day, and in the study of Jung et al [25], it was reported that dental caries-causing S. mutans was detected in the group with the least water in-take. However, these differences were not signi cant results and need to be re-con rmed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%