2015 International Conference on Computer Science and Mechanical Automation (CSMA) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/csma.2015.51
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on Differential GPS Positioning Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…com/de/product/d-rtk-2-high-precision-gnss-mobile-station, accessed on 25 August 2021). An overview of D-GPS systems and their performance can be found in [11].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…com/de/product/d-rtk-2-high-precision-gnss-mobile-station, accessed on 25 August 2021). An overview of D-GPS systems and their performance can be found in [11].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the difference of correction information from the reference stations, differential positioning can be divided into position differential positioning, pseudo-range differential positioning, and carrier phase differential positioning [13]. Pseudo-range differential positioning is most widely used and can meet the positioning and navigation requirements of general IoT terminals.…”
Section: Algorithm Principlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in a forward collision warning application, errors of this magnitude increase the risk of accidents, specially at higher speeds [12,13]. 20 As another example, considering that streets and road lanes have widths between 2.5 and 3.5 m, a lane-level positioning system using only an autonomous single carrier (L1) GNSS receiver would be unreliable since errors and lane widths are in the same order of magnitude. Even though GNSS techniques such as DGNSS (Differential Global Navigation Satellite System), PPP (Pre- 25 cise Point Positioning), or RTK (Real Time Kinematics) respectively provide meter, centimeter, and millimeter accuracy, their performance is also affected by the number of visible satellites and by multipath propagation [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35 Positioning accuracy for vehicle safety is classified into three distinct levels: In this paper we propose Cooperative GNSS Positioning System (CooPS), a 45 system designed to provide which-lane accuracy. To obtain this accuracy level, CooPS uses (i) a combination of V2V and V2I communications over the Dedicated Short Range Communications (DSRC) band in a cooperative way, (ii) the well-known differential GNSS through the position vector differencing method, (iii) a novel technique to compute track and across track axes projections, and 50 (iv) the assumption that GPS receivers located in the same road stretch share the same satellite constellation and ephemerids to overcome the low accuracy (of 10.0 m, typically) [20] of L1 GNSS receivers in Single Point Positioning (SPP) mode. One design requirement is to achieve accurate driving using only off-theshelf GNSS receivers and, as a consequence, avoid compatibility issues imposed 55 by additional sensors between vehicular equipment and the embedded GNSS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%