2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.infrared.2020.103366
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on evolution methods for the optimization of machine learning models based on FT-NIR spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This process is reaping by the GA until a high accuracy of prediction is achieved. Hence, the population's final output individual is the best parameter group [81,82]. Fig.…”
Section: Genetic Algorithm (Ga)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process is reaping by the GA until a high accuracy of prediction is achieved. Hence, the population's final output individual is the best parameter group [81,82]. Fig.…”
Section: Genetic Algorithm (Ga)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two main parameters of the RBF are the regularization parameter (γ) and the width parameter (σ 2 ). Different values of these two parameters lead to changes in the stability and predictive performance of the model [35]. Therefore, there is an urgent need to find optimization methods to optimize γ and σ 2 to improve LS-SVR's learning ability and generalization.…”
Section: Modeling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RBF-LSSVM models were established for the determination of wastewater MIS content. By the former machine learning experiences [35], it is worth to fuse the regularization parameter (γ) and the RBF kernel width (σ 2 ) together, for automatic tuning to search for the optimal combination of parameters. Deep training of ðγ, σÞ is necessary for observing a minimum predictive RMSEV in the calibration-validation process.…”
Section: Determination Of Mis Using the Parametric Rbf-lssvmmentioning
confidence: 99%