2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsrc.2017.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on hydraulic characteristics of sabo dam with a flap structure for debris flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The idea of installing bottom drainage screens along the propagation path of debris flows to reduce their impact was proposed by Hashimoto in Japan in the 1950s Kiyono et al (1986); Gonda (2009). Due to the effectiveness of this energy dissipating structure, several small-scale physical models have been conducted to have a better understanding of debris-flow screens and their mechanism including (i) the effects of different opening widths of permeable screens on the debris-flow run-out distance Gonda (2009), (ii) the effects of different bed sediments with different blocking and opening widths Kim (2013) and (iii) the effects of different location of debris flow screens, in the middle or at the end of propagation path, on the behaviour of debris flows Yifru et al (2018).…”
Section: Reducing the Impact Of The Debris Avalanchementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea of installing bottom drainage screens along the propagation path of debris flows to reduce their impact was proposed by Hashimoto in Japan in the 1950s Kiyono et al (1986); Gonda (2009). Due to the effectiveness of this energy dissipating structure, several small-scale physical models have been conducted to have a better understanding of debris-flow screens and their mechanism including (i) the effects of different opening widths of permeable screens on the debris-flow run-out distance Gonda (2009), (ii) the effects of different bed sediments with different blocking and opening widths Kim (2013) and (iii) the effects of different location of debris flow screens, in the middle or at the end of propagation path, on the behaviour of debris flows Yifru et al (2018).…”
Section: Reducing the Impact Of The Debris Avalanchementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To understand the formation process of the debris flow, this study uses a numerical simulation of debris flow analyse the mechanism and hydraulic characteristics of the interaction for real basins. A 2-D numerical analysis model is developed to analyse for onsite applications based on an existing 2-D numerical model [Kim, 2013b].…”
Section: Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many research efforts have been dedicated to evaluating the performance of debris-flow barriers based on physical and numerical modeling. The small-scale physical modeling has advantages of being repeatable, but reproducing real debris flows with consideration of proper rheological characteristics and entrainment is a daunting task [7][8][9][10][11]. Numerical approaches have been mainly employed to develop numerical models and software to accurately describe and predict debris-flow behaviors [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%