1972
DOI: 10.2208/jscej1969.1972.206_59
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on Hydraulic Resistance and Bed-Load Transport Rate in Alluvial Streams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
255
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 307 publications
(261 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
5
255
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The final parameter that appears in (2.23) is the critical Shields parameter θ b cr,n for each grain size class n. For this, we adopt the formulation of Ashida & Michiue (1972), which accounts for the hiding of small grains between the large grains.…”
Section: Bed Load Transportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final parameter that appears in (2.23) is the critical Shields parameter θ b cr,n for each grain size class n. For this, we adopt the formulation of Ashida & Michiue (1972), which accounts for the hiding of small grains between the large grains.…”
Section: Bed Load Transportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter effect has been known as ''hiding'' since the time of Einstein (1950). Since the groundbreaking work of Egiazaroff (1965) and Ashida and Michiue (1972), it has been established that these two effects nearly cancel each other out [e.g., Wiberg and Smith (1987)] but nevertheless leave the finer grains exposed at the surface somewhat more mobile than neighboring coarser grains [e.g., Parker (1990)]. The residual difference in mobility tends to be small and, in particular, less than might be expected based on the scalings according to which particle weight increases with the cube of grain size whereas drag increases only with the square.…”
Section: Standard Model For Mobility Variation In Mixturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The friction angle extracted from an extrapolation of mobile-bed conditions to the threshold of motion can be expected to be somewhat smaller than the static value [e.g., Ashida and Michiue (1972)]. With this in mind, a value of g of 0.5, corresponding to a friction angle of 26.6Њ, is employed here.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, in this type of model, the transit is a mixture of approximately 30% of material coming from the active layer (in our case the substratum) and 70% coming from the upstream i.e. the bed-load (Egiazaroff [15]; Ashida and Michiue [16]). The difference may result either from errors in the geochemical analyses and in transport capacity calculation within the hydraulic model.…”
Section: Application To the Loire Rivermentioning
confidence: 99%