1996
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-3148.1996.d01-50.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on medical donor deferrals at sessions

Abstract: A 10-month audit of reasons for donor medical deferral at sessions was carried out in two Scottish regions of the SNBTS. Six thousand deferred donors were assessed. Although the deferred donor population mirrored the attending donor population in both regions, significantly more donors, both new and regular, were deferred in the Edinburgh and South East region, compared with the North East. The main differences in deferral were attributable to three clinical conditions (cervical carcinoma in situ, other gynaec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[4] In this study the overall deferral rate was about 6% and the deferral rate was about five times higher in females compared with males i.e. one fifth of female donors were differed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…[4] In this study the overall deferral rate was about 6% and the deferral rate was about five times higher in females compared with males i.e. one fifth of female donors were differed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The rate of deferral differs from region to region and sometimes in the same region from one center to center [2]. The lowest reported rate of rejection was by Talonu [3] (4%) in Papua New Guinea [3] and higher rate (8-15%) was reported by Chaudhary et al [1], Lim et al [4], Blumberg et al [5] and Ranveet et al [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[4] The rate of deferral differs from region to region and sometimes in the same region and one center to another. [5] Deferral incidence [6][7][8][9][10][11][12] The lowest reported rate of rejection was by Talonu T (4%) in Papua New Guinea and higher rate (8-15%) was reported by Chaudhary et al, Blumberg et al and Ranveet et al. [10,[13][14][15] However, studies by other authors have cited low (5.6-7.1%) to very high (20-35.6%) deferral incidence in their donor population, which probably refl ects the regional diversity and marked variation in whole blood donor eligibility criteria internationally.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%