2021
DOI: 10.1007/s12206-021-0612-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on micro-grinding mechanism and surface quality of high-volume fraction SiCp/Al composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the processed aluminum matrix and SiCp particles are irregularly mixed together, it is difficult to distinguish them by SEM observation. Therefore, energy dispersive spectroscope (EDS) analysis was used to realize the differentiation between SiCp particles on the surface and the aluminum matrix [ 30 ]. The EDS surface sweep analysis of sample A after UAG machining with 4 μm is shown in Figure 6 a.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the processed aluminum matrix and SiCp particles are irregularly mixed together, it is difficult to distinguish them by SEM observation. Therefore, energy dispersive spectroscope (EDS) analysis was used to realize the differentiation between SiCp particles on the surface and the aluminum matrix [ 30 ]. The EDS surface sweep analysis of sample A after UAG machining with 4 μm is shown in Figure 6 a.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimization of grinding parameters can not only improve surface quality but also enhance machining efficiency. The spindle speed has the greatest impact on surface roughness, followed by grinding depth and feed speed [ 139 ]. Furthermore, the grinding force generated during the grinding process decreases with an increase in spindle speed, while it increases with higher feed speed and grinding depth [ 140 ].…”
Section: Grinding Machining Of Sicp/almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chen et al developed a surface roughness prediction model for Ti-6Al-4V abrasive belt grinding, based on the response surface methodology, and the average error between experimental measurements and model predictions was 6.08% [11]. Gao et al designed microgrinding tests for composites based on the response surface methodology, and their regression equation model (established by regression analysis and removing the insignificant terms) could relatively accurately reflect the effects of cutting depth, feed speed and spindle speed on surface roughness [12]. Bandapalli et al conducted experimental research and estimations on the surface roughness of high-speed micro-end milling of titanium alloys using ANNs, group method data processing (GMDH) and multivariate regression analysis (MRA), and their observed results showed that the prediction accuracy of neural networks was higher than the other techniques [13].…”
Section: Research and Progress Of Surface Roughness Prediction In Met...mentioning
confidence: 99%