2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9418(02)00085-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on nonisothermal crystallization of maleic anhydride grafted polypropylene/montmorillonite nanocomposite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
62
1
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
62
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The addition of 5% of PP-g-MA in C20A and C30B shows optimum improved performance with the increase in the tensile strength of 22% and 14%, respectively. The reason may be due to high surface area of nanofillers, presence of tallow ammonium group, compatibilising agent, breaking up the large particles into fine nanoparticles which results in higher interfacial adhesion between TPO and clay [13][14][15][16][17]. Similar observations were reported for nylon-6 blended poly(ethylene-ran-propylene) rubber and polystyrene with polypropylene [18][19][20].…”
Section: Tensile Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…The addition of 5% of PP-g-MA in C20A and C30B shows optimum improved performance with the increase in the tensile strength of 22% and 14%, respectively. The reason may be due to high surface area of nanofillers, presence of tallow ammonium group, compatibilising agent, breaking up the large particles into fine nanoparticles which results in higher interfacial adhesion between TPO and clay [13][14][15][16][17]. Similar observations were reported for nylon-6 blended poly(ethylene-ran-propylene) rubber and polystyrene with polypropylene [18][19][20].…”
Section: Tensile Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…It indicates that crystallization of PP-g-MA/nanoclay composite occurs in one stage at higher rate than PP-g-MA, where crystallization has two stages. The reason of this may be the nucleation effect of nanoclay, that points out in literature [5,12,13].…”
Section: D Graphmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…24 In our study, n values lied in 2.6 to 2.9 for all samples, which is consistent with other PP composite systems such as PP/carbon nanotubes, 25 PP/nano-calcium carbonate, 26 and PP/clay composites. 27 They increased with an increase of cooling rate. However, at a given cooling rate and CNF content, n values of both untreated and heat treated CNF composites showed similar to those of pure PP.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%