2011
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.94-96.1638
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on Particle Inconsistency Problem in Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics

Abstract: Abstract. In the smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) method, the particle inconsistency problem significantly influences the calculation accuracy. In the present study, we investigate primarily the influence of the particle inconsistency on the first derivative of field functions and discuss the behavior of several methods of addressing this problem. In addition, we propose a new approach by which to compensate for this problem, especially for functions having a non-zero second derivative, that is less compu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Examples of the applications of the SPH method include crack-propagation simulation of a solder ball 21) , simulation of the forging process 22) , dam break analysis 23) , and fluid mechanics of splashing bow waves on ships 24) . However, this method has some disadvantages, such as tensile instability, unclear material boundary, and particle inconsitency [25][26][27] . Furthermore, for small deformations, the FEM proves to be more efficient than the SPH method, whereas the SPH method surpasses the FEM in efficiency for large deformations 28) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of the applications of the SPH method include crack-propagation simulation of a solder ball 21) , simulation of the forging process 22) , dam break analysis 23) , and fluid mechanics of splashing bow waves on ships 24) . However, this method has some disadvantages, such as tensile instability, unclear material boundary, and particle inconsitency [25][26][27] . Furthermore, for small deformations, the FEM proves to be more efficient than the SPH method, whereas the SPH method surpasses the FEM in efficiency for large deformations 28) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%