2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2004.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on photophysical properties of intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) compound: 4-(diphenylamino)biphenyl-4′-boronic acid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The estimated dipole moment difference is 12.2 D (debye) (slope 9700 ± 990, R 2 > 0.92), based on the assumption that the Onsager cavity radius a equals 5.35 Å, which is half of the optimized distance between the two farthest atoms of the molecule in the direction of charge separation (10.7 Å) This estimation from the Lippert−Mataga equation is based on the assumption that the photophysical properties of ellipticine can be described by the theory of general solvent effect; hence, it may not hold if specific solvent effects are involved. Actually, Stokes' shifts observed for solvents with a polarity smaller than 0.03 did not follow the trend (Figure b).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The estimated dipole moment difference is 12.2 D (debye) (slope 9700 ± 990, R 2 > 0.92), based on the assumption that the Onsager cavity radius a equals 5.35 Å, which is half of the optimized distance between the two farthest atoms of the molecule in the direction of charge separation (10.7 Å) This estimation from the Lippert−Mataga equation is based on the assumption that the photophysical properties of ellipticine can be described by the theory of general solvent effect; hence, it may not hold if specific solvent effects are involved. Actually, Stokes' shifts observed for solvents with a polarity smaller than 0.03 did not follow the trend (Figure b).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To better understand the factors that affect Stokes' shifts of ellipticine, the data points in Figure b can be roughly divided into two groups corresponding to Δ f values smaller than 0.03 and larger than 0.15. In the more polar region (Δ f > 0.15), a linear trend was found and the corresponding dipole moment difference was estimated to be 12.2 D. Such a large dipole moment difference usually indicates the occurrence of intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) induced by the solvent after excitation. , Scheme describes the mechanism by which the ICT occurs. In most cases, solvent polarity is believed to be the effect driving an ICT, but for ellipticine, another important factorhydrogen bondingshould be considered as well.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dipole moments ( μ e – μ g ) between the ground state and the excited state are estimated by the LM function to be about 36.44, 20.54, 10.57, and 12.89 D. Similarly, evident correlation coefficients for the probes were observed in the MR plot. This major difference in the dipole moment from the ground state to the excited state facilitates charge transfer within the probe molecule. This confirms that the probe has an ICT mechanism that provides the basis for subsequent viscosity responses. The Δ μ of probes HT-SA and HT-SA-S is larger compared to the other probes, which also corresponds to the high solvochromism ability of these two molecules in the above experiments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…As TICT usually exhibits a significantly higher excited dipole moment than the above, the above increase of the excited state dipole moment indicates the presence of intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) properties in this molecule. 37,42,43 However, molecules are inherently nonspherical, so the assumption of using molecular radius instead of cavity radius in this paper is only an approximation. Since TCy3 showed a good "turn-on" response to viscosity, our previous speculation that DNA blocks the formation of TICT mechanism of TCy3 is further advanced.…”
Section: Dye To Viscosity Responsementioning
confidence: 99%