2002
DOI: 10.1002/pi.920
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on polypropylene/natural rubber blend with polystyrene‐modified natural rubber as compatibilizer

Abstract: Polystyrene‐modified natural rubber (SNR) was prepared in the laboratory and subsequently used as compatibilizer in polypropylene/natural rubber (PP/NR) blends. The effect of SNR (at 5%, 10%, 15% and 20% by volume) in PP/NR (70/30) blend was studied by maintaining the rubber volume while PP volume was replaced by SNR accordingly. The sequence of mixing was found to affect the blend morphology and tensile properties. The effect of curatives on the tensile properties of the blends was also investigated. The addi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[1] For instance, poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) is a hard glassy polymer; although highly excellent in optical transparency it is not suitable for some specific end-uses due to its brittle fracture. [6,7] This third component is expected to be distributed around the phase boundary to enhance the adhesion between the blend components, as the coupling agent in case of glass fiber reinforced composites does, and in this way significantly improves the mechanical properties of the blend material. [2 -5] However, unlike copolymers where the chemically different monomer units are linked by chemical bonds, blending creates serious problems, especially in the achievement and preservation of the final degree of dispersion if the two polymer partners of the blend are not thermodynamically miscible.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1] For instance, poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) is a hard glassy polymer; although highly excellent in optical transparency it is not suitable for some specific end-uses due to its brittle fracture. [6,7] This third component is expected to be distributed around the phase boundary to enhance the adhesion between the blend components, as the coupling agent in case of glass fiber reinforced composites does, and in this way significantly improves the mechanical properties of the blend material. [2 -5] However, unlike copolymers where the chemically different monomer units are linked by chemical bonds, blending creates serious problems, especially in the achievement and preservation of the final degree of dispersion if the two polymer partners of the blend are not thermodynamically miscible.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most of the commercially available polymer blends lag behind due to inherent incompatibility of the blend components [7]. Molecular level compatibility is not achieved for a PP/NR blend [24]. So, many studies have been devoted to increase the compatibility of this system [24–27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular level compatibility is not achieved for a PP/NR blend [24]. So, many studies have been devoted to increase the compatibility of this system [24–27]. In common practice, a third component, typically a copolymer, may be added as a compatibilizer or a chemical reaction can be induced to modify the interfacial adhesion in the two‐phase polymer blend [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, grafting a small amount of glycidyl methacrylate (GMA) onto NR using emulsion polymerization produces a polymer blend of GMA and NR polymers and GMA/NR graft copolymer that occur during the polymerization, exhibiting improved tensile strength and modulus with insignificant loss in elongation at break, which has led to the use of this polymer blend as seal, adhesive, and coating 2. The improved properties are ascribed to the existence of vinyl polymer possessing better properties and of the graft copolymer in the polymer blend, which helps reduce the interfacial energy between the vinyl polymer and the rubber phases, and thus it can be said that that graft copolymer acts as a compatibilizer 3–6. Better mechanical properties also happen for the styrene/NR blend which are compatibilized by using styrene/NR graft copolymer, of which modulus and hardness are higher than those of neat NR 7…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 The improved properties are ascribed to the existence of vinyl polymer possessing better properties and of the graft copolymer in the polymer blend, which helps reduce the interfacial energy between the vinyl polymer and the rubber phases, and thus it can be said that that graft copolymer acts as a compatibilizer. [3][4][5][6] Better mechanical properties also happen for the styrene/NR blend which are compatibilized by using styrene/NR graft copolymer, of which modulus and hardness are higher than those of neat NR. 7 To graft styrene and NR using free-radical emulsion polymerization, redox initiator is the most suitable to initiate the graft copolymerization because it not only works well at high pH (the presence of ammonia in NR latex) but also is insensitive to the existence of oxygen in the system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%