2020
DOI: 10.3788/aos202040.1030002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on Prediction Model of Soil Cadmium Content Moisture Content Correction Based on GWO-SVR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figure 17, the EDEM screening results show that the maximum screening efficiency is 83.24% and the minimum screening time is 12.24 s. Meanwhile, the maximum screening efficiency and minimum screening time predicted with the GWO-SVR screening optimization model under the same screening parameters are 88.37% and 11.83 s, respectively. The error of the maximum screening efficiency between predicted value and test value is 5.81%, while the error of the minimum screening time between predicted Meanwhile, according to relevant research [64], for similar datasets (with fewer data samples and higher data dimensions), the prediction model constructed with GWO-SVR has better fitting performance compared to the ENR, Lasso, RR, and SVR algorithms. Compared to PSO-SVR, GA-SVR, and SA-SVR, GWO-SVR has stronger global search capabilities and convergence details [79].…”
Section: Verification Of the Optimization Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As shown in Figure 17, the EDEM screening results show that the maximum screening efficiency is 83.24% and the minimum screening time is 12.24 s. Meanwhile, the maximum screening efficiency and minimum screening time predicted with the GWO-SVR screening optimization model under the same screening parameters are 88.37% and 11.83 s, respectively. The error of the maximum screening efficiency between predicted value and test value is 5.81%, while the error of the minimum screening time between predicted Meanwhile, according to relevant research [64], for similar datasets (with fewer data samples and higher data dimensions), the prediction model constructed with GWO-SVR has better fitting performance compared to the ENR, Lasso, RR, and SVR algorithms. Compared to PSO-SVR, GA-SVR, and SA-SVR, GWO-SVR has stronger global search capabilities and convergence details [79].…”
Section: Verification Of the Optimization Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Meanwhile, according to relevant research [64], for similar datasets (with fewer data samples and higher data dimensions), the prediction model constructed with GWO-SVR has better fitting performance compared to the ENR, Lasso, RR, and SVR algorithms. Compared to PSO-SVR, GA-SVR, and SA-SVR, GWO-SVR has stronger global search capabilities and convergence details [79].…”
Section: Optimization Process and Results Of The Screening Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation