2016
DOI: 10.1117/12.2242970
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on supporting force sensing and control during large aperture space mirror test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though defocus can be compensated by adjusting the distance between mirrors, magnification and field of view of the optical system are affected. Hence, it helps if defocus is controlled by mirror design and can be avoided altogether [12]. This leaves us with only three surface errors, namely defocus, coma and astigmatism that correspond to distortions of order 3 or lower and can be controlled by Mirror-MFD design [8].…”
Section: Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even though defocus can be compensated by adjusting the distance between mirrors, magnification and field of view of the optical system are affected. Hence, it helps if defocus is controlled by mirror design and can be avoided altogether [12]. This leaves us with only three surface errors, namely defocus, coma and astigmatism that correspond to distortions of order 3 or lower and can be controlled by Mirror-MFD design [8].…”
Section: Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3. The symmetry constraint is introduced to accommodate inertial loading along any in-plane direction [12].…”
Section: 21function Responsementioning
confidence: 99%