2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2021.121926
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on the control of propellant flow by electric field in ionic liquid electrospray thruster

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A small amount of EIL fails to completely fill the micropores of the porous emitter, so the EIL must be lifted first to the emission sites from internal pores by a strong electric field. At this point, the electric field acts as a flow switcher, as validated in a prior study . Upon comparing Figure a with Figure a, it is discernible that the emission current by using a porous ceramic emitter is one order of magnitude lower than that of a porous titanium emitter.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A small amount of EIL fails to completely fill the micropores of the porous emitter, so the EIL must be lifted first to the emission sites from internal pores by a strong electric field. At this point, the electric field acts as a flow switcher, as validated in a prior study . Upon comparing Figure a with Figure a, it is discernible that the emission current by using a porous ceramic emitter is one order of magnitude lower than that of a porous titanium emitter.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…At this point, the electric field acts as a flow switcher, as validated in a prior study. 43 Upon comparing Figure 3a with Figure 7a, it is discernible that the emission current by using a porous ceramic emitter is one order of magnitude lower than that of a porous titanium emitter. The observed difference is attributed to the fact that titanium, being a conductive material, can be deemed as a three-dimensional equipotential body in the electric field.…”
Section: Effect Of Propellant Components On Electrospraymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…First, the droplet size affects its charge-mass ratio, which can evaluate its acceleration performance between the emission surface and extractor; a higher charge-mass ratio means it can be accelerated to a higher velocity at the same electric field conditions; second, physical property of propellant mainly affects the charging conditions and its viscosity also affect the formation of CSWs; third, the velocity indicates the performance of the electric propulsion thruster, and a higher specific impulse means it can work a longer time in orbit for the same orbit transfer task; fourth, the trajectory of the charged droplets affect the plume divergence, which should be limited in a fixed range to avoid affecting the working condition of spacecraft [28]. The size, velocity, and plume divergence of charged droplets in the UEP system have been investigated in the former work [21,29]. Due to different emphases, the experimental designs of the practical systems studied the size, velocity, and plume divergence have some differences from this work.…”
Section: Experimental Design Of the Uep Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For small satellites with limited resources, these features significantly reduce the volume, mass, and power requirements of the propulsion system. However, it is noted that ionic liquid [19][20][21] is used in ILET, and the plume consisting of charged particles probably impacts and deposits on the spacecraft's surface, leading to charging and damage to surface components or circuits [22,23]. Therefore, comprehensive studies on the self-neutralization of the ILET's plume are imperative.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%