2019
DOI: 10.1039/c8ra09680e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on the effect of PolyFR and its FR system on the flame retardancy and foaming behavior of polystyrene

Abstract: Environmentally-friendly flame retardant, PolyFR, has an excellent effect on the flame retardancy and foaming behavior of polystyrene.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The optimal flammability was obtained with graphite at 1.9 wt%, the reduction in the pHRR was almost 25% compared to the neat polymer and the compressive strength achieving a maximum value of 26 KPa when the filler content was 1.9 wt%, finally, they concluded that the graphite addition forms a layer during the burning of the foam surface. Also, Wang et al 26 studied the effect of a brominated polymeric flame retardant based in particles as antimonous oxide (Sb 2 O 3 ), organo‐montmorillonite (OMMT) and graphite on the flame retardancy and foaming behavior of polystyrene. The addition of 2 wt% graphite into the flame‐retardant system exhibited a reduction in the pHHR of about 28%, this effect was attributed to the barrier and labyrinth effects of the dispersed silicate layers which hinder diffusion of volatile decomposition products within the polystyrene composites leading to weakening of droplet effect and impede the circulation of HBr.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimal flammability was obtained with graphite at 1.9 wt%, the reduction in the pHRR was almost 25% compared to the neat polymer and the compressive strength achieving a maximum value of 26 KPa when the filler content was 1.9 wt%, finally, they concluded that the graphite addition forms a layer during the burning of the foam surface. Also, Wang et al 26 studied the effect of a brominated polymeric flame retardant based in particles as antimonous oxide (Sb 2 O 3 ), organo‐montmorillonite (OMMT) and graphite on the flame retardancy and foaming behavior of polystyrene. The addition of 2 wt% graphite into the flame‐retardant system exhibited a reduction in the pHHR of about 28%, this effect was attributed to the barrier and labyrinth effects of the dispersed silicate layers which hinder diffusion of volatile decomposition products within the polystyrene composites leading to weakening of droplet effect and impede the circulation of HBr.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nucleation occurred more easily at the interface of the two substances, compared with homogeneous nucleation, due to the lower activation energy of heterogeneous nucleation. 30 Therefore, numerous nucleation sites were available due to the presence of the AMWs, which promoted the heterogeneous nucleation of PBT, resulting in an increase in nucleation density and thereby reducing the crystallite sizes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 38 ] In addition, a comparison of LOI values for fossil‐based, fire‐retardant FR foams with the best performance: PVC, phenolic resin and polyimide, such a comparison shows the high performance of CNF/XG/MTM foams. [ 39–46 ]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%