2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.104147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on the effect of graphene oxide (GO) feeding on silk properties based on segmented precise measurement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[46,48] As NMs have been detected in degummed (devoid of sericin) silk, this indicates that, once in the SG,NMs actually interact with the fibroin core.Itiswidely accepted that NMs incorporated in silk by silkworm feeding do not alter the basic silk structure but its secondary conformation. [55] As the ahelix/random coil structures confer ductility and toughness to the silk, and b-sheets provide stiffness, [43] specific physicochemical interactions of NMs with fibroin (likely including electrostatic, p-p stacking, van der Waals and hydrogen bonding [48] )w ould change the ratio of secondary motifs, resulting in upgraded mechanical performance.Itseems that oxidized carbon-based NMs (GO,GQDs,CDs), [46,48,54] smallsize Ag NPs, [57] and hydroxyapatite NPs [65] lead to an increase in a-helix and random coil structures by hindering their conversion to b-sheets during fiber spinning.T his would explain the high ductility and improved toughness reported in most of these cases (Figure 3d). Theo pposite trend is observed for CNTs,w hich is coupled to the increase in bturns [52] responsible for the silk stiffening.H owever,l ittle or no changes in the secondary structure were observed when silkworms were fed large-size Ag NPs [58] or cellulose nanofibers.…”
Section: Silk Biomatricesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[46,48] As NMs have been detected in degummed (devoid of sericin) silk, this indicates that, once in the SG,NMs actually interact with the fibroin core.Itiswidely accepted that NMs incorporated in silk by silkworm feeding do not alter the basic silk structure but its secondary conformation. [55] As the ahelix/random coil structures confer ductility and toughness to the silk, and b-sheets provide stiffness, [43] specific physicochemical interactions of NMs with fibroin (likely including electrostatic, p-p stacking, van der Waals and hydrogen bonding [48] )w ould change the ratio of secondary motifs, resulting in upgraded mechanical performance.Itseems that oxidized carbon-based NMs (GO,GQDs,CDs), [46,48,54] smallsize Ag NPs, [57] and hydroxyapatite NPs [65] lead to an increase in a-helix and random coil structures by hindering their conversion to b-sheets during fiber spinning.T his would explain the high ductility and improved toughness reported in most of these cases (Figure 3d). Theo pposite trend is observed for CNTs,w hich is coupled to the increase in bturns [52] responsible for the silk stiffening.H owever,l ittle or no changes in the secondary structure were observed when silkworms were fed large-size Ag NPs [58] or cellulose nanofibers.…”
Section: Silk Biomatricesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other carbon‐based NMs, such as graphene derivatives, have also been fed to silkworms resulting in improved silk. [ 45 , 48 , 51 , 53 , 54 ] While graphene nanoplatelets or graphene oxide (GO) lead to modest to poor mechanical improvements (Figure 3 c,d ), graphene quantum dots (GQDs) have demonstrated their superiority in silk reinforcement, even at very low doses. [ 48 , 53 ] Such is the increase in mechanical properties granted by some carbon‐based NMs, that their feeding to silkworms has been regarded as a way to upgrade properties of silkworm silk to that of spider silk.…”
Section: In Situ Biogenic Processing Of Nms Into a Biomatrixmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other carbon-based NMs,s uch as graphene derivatives,h ave also been fed to silkworms resulting in improved silk. [45,48,51,53,54] While graphene nanoplatelets or graphene oxide (GO) lead to modest to poor mechanical improvements (Figure 3c,d), graphene quantum dots (GQDs) have demonstrated their superiority in silk reinforcement, even at very low doses. [48,53] Such is the increase in mechanical properties granted by some carbon-based NMs,t hat their feeding to silkworms has been regarded as aw ay to upgrade properties of silkworm silk to that of spider silk.…”
Section: Silk Biomatricesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[46,48] As NMs have been detected in degummed (devoid of sericin) silk, this indicates that, once in the SG,NMs actually interact with the fibroin core.Itiswidely accepted that NMs incorporated in silk by silkworm feeding do not alter the basic silk structure but its secondary conformation. [55] As the ahelix/random coil structures confer ductility and toughness to the silk, and b-sheets provide stiffness, [43] specific physicochemical interactions of NMs with fibroin (likely including electrostatic, p-p stacking, van der Waals and hydrogen bonding [48] )w ould change the ratio of secondary motifs, resulting in upgraded mechanical performance.Itseems that oxidized carbon-based NMs (GO,GQDs,CDs), [46,48,54] smallsize Ag NPs, [57] and hydroxyapatite NPs [65] lead to an increase in a-helix and random coil structures by hindering their conversion to b-sheets during fiber spinning.T his would explain the high ductility and improved toughness reported in most of these cases (Figure 3d). Theo pposite trend is observed for CNTs,w hich is coupled to the increase in bturns [52] responsible for the silk stiffening.H owever,l ittle or no changes in the secondary structure were observed when silkworms were fed large-size Ag NPs [58] or cellulose nanofibers.…”
Section: Silk Biomatricesmentioning
confidence: 99%