Iccrem 2018 2018
DOI: 10.1061/9780784481745.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on the Efficiency Estimation for Chinese Construction Industry through Three-Stage DEA Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the DEA method is increasingly widely applied and continuously expanding. Li et al (2010) [16] and other related studies constructed a resource allocation model based on the DEA method; Kádárová et al (2015) [17] integrated the DEA and balanced scorecard methods to establish a comprehensive performance and efficiency management system for industrial enterprises and their processes; Genwen et al (2017) [18] further conducted a comprehensive study on the three-stage DEA model; Na et al (2019) [19], Tachega et al (2021) [20], and other related studies used static DEA methods to calculate the innovation efficiency of China's environmental protection industry and the energy efficiency of African oil-producing economies, respectively; Wenjinget al (2015) [21] and Shijian et al ( 2018) [22] used the two-stage DEA method to compute innovation efficiency using interprovincial and industrial industry data, respectively; Pishgar-Komleh et al (2020) [23] and other related studies further calculated the efficiency of the poor output of Polish winter wheat using the life cycle assessment + DEA framework; Huangbao (2014) [24] adopted the DEA Malmquist method to evaluate the innovation efficiency of Chinese high-technology industries. Regarding research on the convergence trend of innovation efficiency, most scholars conducted comprehensive studies on their convergence trends of innovation efficiency using macro inter-provincial and industry data from the regional [25][26][27][28][29] and industrial [30][31][32][33] levels, which provided a solid theoretical foundation for this study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the DEA method is increasingly widely applied and continuously expanding. Li et al (2010) [16] and other related studies constructed a resource allocation model based on the DEA method; Kádárová et al (2015) [17] integrated the DEA and balanced scorecard methods to establish a comprehensive performance and efficiency management system for industrial enterprises and their processes; Genwen et al (2017) [18] further conducted a comprehensive study on the three-stage DEA model; Na et al (2019) [19], Tachega et al (2021) [20], and other related studies used static DEA methods to calculate the innovation efficiency of China's environmental protection industry and the energy efficiency of African oil-producing economies, respectively; Wenjinget al (2015) [21] and Shijian et al ( 2018) [22] used the two-stage DEA method to compute innovation efficiency using interprovincial and industrial industry data, respectively; Pishgar-Komleh et al (2020) [23] and other related studies further calculated the efficiency of the poor output of Polish winter wheat using the life cycle assessment + DEA framework; Huangbao (2014) [24] adopted the DEA Malmquist method to evaluate the innovation efficiency of Chinese high-technology industries. Regarding research on the convergence trend of innovation efficiency, most scholars conducted comprehensive studies on their convergence trends of innovation efficiency using macro inter-provincial and industry data from the regional [25][26][27][28][29] and industrial [30][31][32][33] levels, which provided a solid theoretical foundation for this study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%