2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102491
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on the feasibility of using agricultural waste in the production of concrete blocks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
1
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Mainly because these bio-based products meet the properties and performance requirements for building materials. In addition, they are similar to commercial products and conform to regulatory specifications [5, 18, To improve the properties and/or guarantee the performance of most of the bio-based products in Table 1, studies suggest substitution percentages between 5 and 15% by weight of AWBs [6,16,18,19,21,25,33,50,51,53,66,69,77,90,100,103,115]. These findings align with a study that identified similar percentages, between 5 and 10% AWB for fired clay bricks [100].…”
Section: Main Types and Properties Of Awbs Used By Categorysupporting
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Mainly because these bio-based products meet the properties and performance requirements for building materials. In addition, they are similar to commercial products and conform to regulatory specifications [5, 18, To improve the properties and/or guarantee the performance of most of the bio-based products in Table 1, studies suggest substitution percentages between 5 and 15% by weight of AWBs [6,16,18,19,21,25,33,50,51,53,66,69,77,90,100,103,115]. These findings align with a study that identified similar percentages, between 5 and 10% AWB for fired clay bricks [100].…”
Section: Main Types and Properties Of Awbs Used By Categorysupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Contrary to [84] and in line with the findings of [24], there is a large and long-standing field of research in AWB-based SCMs for use in concrete production. In this same category, 24% of the studies in the period 2004 to 2021 used AWBs as a total and/or partial substitute material for conventional fine and/or coarse aggregates in concrete [21,28,29,36,66,67,83,[89][90][91][92]. A smaller percentage (3%), between 2019 and 2021, analysed the potential of AWBs as additives and/or aggregates for soil stabilisation and/or improvement of geotechnical properties [69,70,93].…”
Section: Main Approaches To Scientific Production-systematic Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The technical feasibility of this process is investigated based on experimental data and the implementation of practical grain sizes where possible (Fiber and Fine). Many recycled materials were used in concrete to substitute aggregates or cement such as construction, electronic, and agricultural wastes [9][10][11][12][13][14]. Furthermore, the recovered PVC wastes have been studied in numerous investigations to substitute aggregates for developing sustainable concretes [4,[15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(F. N. A. A. Aziz et al, 2014b); (F. N. A.A. Aziz et al, 2014a);(Raut & Gomez, 2016);(A. Aziz et al, 2017) who examined a lightweight mortar using palm fruit fiber with the addition of 0%, 0.5%, 1% and 1.5%.Asrial, et al, (2017);(Souza et al, 2021);(da Silva et al, 2021);(Wu & Montalvo, 2021); roxb)(Tjaronge & Caronge, 2021) using 3%, 6% and 9% palm fiber waste in the manufacture of paving blocks can reduce cracks, be lighter and can reduce heat.CONCLUSIONSThe results of measurements of paving blocks without additives with a shrinkage of 0.21%, while the results of measurements of paving blocks with additives with an average shrinkage of 0.47% are greater than those of paving blocks without additives.The results of testing the water content of paving blocks without additives were 12.49%, while the results of testing paving blocks with additives had an average water content of 13.12% more than paving blocks without additives.The test results for the weight of paving blocks without additives were 3,035 kg, while the results of testing paving blocks with additives had an average weight of 2.95 kg lighter than paving blocks without additives by 2.8%2.8 %.The compressive strength test results of paving blocks without additives were 43.33 kg/cm², while the results of testing paving blocks with additional materials were able to withstand an average load of 55.41 kg/cm², stronger than paving blocks without additives of 12.23 %.The material tested in this study was the quality of the paving blocks in the manufacture of which natural fiber was added, namely king pineapple leaf fiber as much as 3%, 5% and 7%. The composition of the mixture is made with a ratio of cement and sand (1: 5).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%