Chemical stimulation is a promising method for enhancing
coalbed
methane (CBM) recovery. Since conventional acids may cause formation
damage and severe corrosion, this paper investigated the possibility
of using GLDA (l-glutamic acid N, N-diacetic acid)a chelating agentand fluoroboric
acid (HBF4) as alternatives to HCl. In addition, the stress
sensitivity effect of coal during chemical stimulation was considered.
A comparative evaluation from the perspectives of mineral dissolution/precipitation,
pore structure changes, micromorphology change, and permeability variations
with effective stress was done using Qinshui Basin coal samples. The
results show that GLDA is preferable for CBM reservoir stimulation.
Coal permeability increased 9.73 times and 17.09 times after injecting
2.5 wt % HCl and 5 wt % GLDA, respectively. However, 27% reduction
in permeability was reported for the 4 wt % HBF4-acidized
coal sample due to fluoride precipitation. With the effective stress
increased from 1.5 to 5.5 MPa, the permeability reduction rates of
raw coal and HCl-, GLDA-, and HBF4-treated coal samples
were 76.92, 39.55, 38.18, and 91.61%, and the stress sensitivity coefficients
were 0.374, 0.126, 0.123, and 0.613, respectively. Coal permeability
enhancement after GLDA stimulation benefits from increased proportions
of seepage pores and macropores and a more unified pore structure.
Although HBF4 has a stronger dissolving ability to silicate
minerals, it will loosen the coal skeleton, weaken the compressive
strength, and then lead to cleat closure. GLDA can decrease fracture
compressibility (C
f) because of its limitation
of dissolving ability, and robust minerals such as quartz and feldspar
can be preserved for supporting coal cleats. 5 wt % GLDA at pH = 2
exhibits 0.69 g/m2·h corrosion rate, which is 9.06%
of that of HCl. This study shows that GLDA effectively enhances coal
permeability and decreases coal stress sensitivity, which provides
references for field applications.