Study on the Mechanical Properties and Hydration Behavior of Steel Slag–Red Mud–Electrolytic Manganese Residue Based Composite Mortar

Abstract

The functional and mechanical properties of steel slag (SS)–red mud (RM)–electrolytic manganese residue (EMR)-based composite mortar under different matching ratio conditions were investigated in this paper to examine the synergistic cementing effect among multiple solid wastes. The hydration characteristics of the composite mortar and its microstructure were characterized by the heat of hydration assessment, X-ray diffraction, thermogravimetric analysis, and other tests. The results of the study showed that compared with the pure cement group, 30% SS alone will inhibit the hydration reaction of the slurry, thus reducing the mechanical properties of the mortar, while compounding the appropriate amount of RM, and EMR can effectively reduce the negative impact of SS on the mechanical properties of the mortar. The flexural and compressive strengths of the composite mortar at 28 d were the highest when 15% of SS, 12% of RM, and 3% of EMR were mixed, which were 7.2 MPa and 41.4 MPa at 28 d, respectively. Compared with the test group with 30% SS alone, the flexural and compressive strengths increased by 18.0% and 25.5%. This is mainly because the incorporation of RM and EMR not only plays the role of physical filling, but the free alkali in RM and sulfate material in EMR can also compoundly stimulate the hydration activity of SS to produce more calcium alumina (AFt) and hydrated calcium silicate (C–S–H gel), thus improving the microstructure of mortar, which makes the overall decrease of 26.35% of multiharmful and harmful pores and the overall increase of harmless and less harmful pores of composite mortar specimens of 43.57%.

Study on the Alkali–Sulfur Co-Activation and Mechanical Properties of Low-Carbon Cementitious Composite Materials Based on Electrolytic Manganese Residue, Carbide Slag, and Granulated Blast-Furnace Slag

“…Sample EGC11 (GBFS content of 20%, EMR content of 8%, and CS content of 2%) exhibited the optimal strength, and the 28 d compressive strength was 45.5 MPa. The strength of the specimen improved, owing to the ability of EMR and CS to fill the pores and enhance the density of the mortar [28]. Additionally, the sulfate phase in EMR and the free alkali substances in CS effectively stimulated the hydration activity of GBFS, leading to the generation of more hydration products [29,30].…”