Study on the non-uniform contact during ELID groove grinding

Mou-cheng, WU; Zhang, Kaifei; Ren, Cheng

doi:10.1016/j.precisioneng.2014.07.011

Cited by 11 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Therefore, developing cost-effective nanocomposites ceramic machining technique can significantly broaden its possible applications. To solve the problem, researchers have examined many ultraprecise machining methods, such as prestressed machining, ELID grinding, magnetic abrasive polishing, and ultrasonic vibration machining [3][4][5][6][7]. Currently, ELID grinding and ultrasonic vibration-aided grinding are considered to be fairly mature methods.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Grinding Parameter Optimization of Ultrasound-Aided Electrolytic in Process Dressing for Finishing Nanocomposite Ceramics

Fan

Zhao

Jia

et al. 2016

Mathematical Problems in Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In order to achieve the precision and efficient processing of nanocomposite ceramics, the ultrasound-aided electrolytic in process dressing method was proposed. But how to realize grinding parameter optimization, that is, the maximum processing efficiency, on the premise of the assurance of best workpiece quality is a problem that needs to be solved urgently. Firstly, this research investigated the influence of grinding parameters on material removal rate and critical ductile depth, and their mathematic models based on the existing models were developed to simulate the material removal process. Then, on the basis of parameter sensitivity analysis based on partial derivative, the sensitivity models of material removal rates on grinding parameter were established and computed quantitatively by MATLAB, and the key grinding parameter for optimal grinding process was found. Finally, the theoretical analyses were verified by experiments: the material removal rate increases with the increase of grinding parameters, including grinding depth (ap), axial feeding speed (fa), workpiece speed (Vw), and wheel speed (Vs); the parameter sensitivity of material removal rate was in a descending order asap>fa>Vw>Vs; the most sensitive parameter (ap) was optimized and it was found that the better machining result has been obtained whenapwas about 3.73 μm.

show abstract