2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.sandf.2015.09.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on the pore water pressure dissipation method as a liquefaction countermeasure using soil–water coupled finite deformation analysis equipped with a macro-element method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, in addition to knowing whether this technique would be effective or not in preventing liquefaction, prediction of the amount of settlement that would occur when liquefaction is inhibited is also an important point. Noda et al 29) analyzed the principle of this technique by incorporating the Fig.14 Distributions of the degree of saturation after the earthquake, showing the rise in water level 25) . .…”
Section: Ground Improvement Ground Reinforcement Methodolo-gies Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in addition to knowing whether this technique would be effective or not in preventing liquefaction, prediction of the amount of settlement that would occur when liquefaction is inhibited is also an important point. Noda et al 29) analyzed the principle of this technique by incorporating the Fig.14 Distributions of the degree of saturation after the earthquake, showing the rise in water level 25) . .…”
Section: Ground Improvement Ground Reinforcement Methodolo-gies Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SYS Cam-clay model (Asaoka et al, 2002) was used as a constitutive model of the soil skeleton for al soil materials. For simplicity, it was assumed that the permeability coefficient k for each ground layer to be isotropic and logarithmically related to the void ratio e in the manner expressed in 0 0 e ln e   k k C k (7) where C k is the coefficient of permeability change. As shown in Table 1, C k , k 0 , and e 0 were determined based on the results of consolidation tests on undisturbed samples.…”
Section: Verification Of the Proposed Methods Based On Simulating An Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, the model can represent the behavior of sandy soils, and it can simulate the compaction of loose sand into dense sand during cyclic drained shear and the decrease in effective stress and loss of shear stiffness during cyclic undrained shear by describing changes in the skeleton structure (Asaoka et al 2002). Further, the model works robustly when introduced to soil-water-coupled finite-deformation analysis (Noda et al , 2015Tashiro et al 2015;Yamada et al 2015;Nonaka et al 2017a, b;Nguyen et al 2015). Recently, a model that covers even cement-improved soil has been proposed by adding cementation to the skeletal structure concept (Yamada et al 2022b).…”
Section: Three Loading Surfaces Composed Of the Sys Cam-clay Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%