2014
DOI: 10.1631/jzus.a1400062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on the safety of operating high-speed railway vehicles subjected to crosswinds

Abstract: Abstract:A coupled vehicle-track dynamic model is put forward for use in investigating the safety effects of crosswinds on the operation of a high-speed railway vehicle. In this model, the vehicle is modeled as a nonlinear multi-body system, and the ballasted track is modeled as a three-layer discrete elastic support system. The steady aerodynamic forces caused by crosswinds are modeled as ramp-shaped external forces being exerted on the vehicle body. This model was used in a numerical analysis of the dynamic … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Railway system dynamics studies have been performed for almost a century, resulting in thousands of papers and theoretical models being published (Knothe and Grassie, 1993;Popp et al, 1999;Evans and Berg, 2009;Zhai et al, 2009;Arnold et al, 2011;Xiao et al, 2014). Throughout previous studies, there are mainly two types of simulation models: singlevehicle/track coupling models and models for multivehicles (or trains) coupled with a rigid or nearly rigid track.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Railway system dynamics studies have been performed for almost a century, resulting in thousands of papers and theoretical models being published (Knothe and Grassie, 1993;Popp et al, 1999;Evans and Berg, 2009;Zhai et al, 2009;Arnold et al, 2011;Xiao et al, 2014). Throughout previous studies, there are mainly two types of simulation models: singlevehicle/track coupling models and models for multivehicles (or trains) coupled with a rigid or nearly rigid track.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parameter variation analyses show that fluctuation ranges of the maximum V-M stress and the Traditional multi-body approach in 2008;Xiao et al, 2014) Transient FE simulation of this work frictional work on a corrugated rail increase with the traction coefficient. This means that for the same excitation (e.g., a corrugation in this study) the irregular material response, namely the irregular plastic deformation and wear, probably becomes more severe as the friction exploitation level increases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The vertical force obtained from the transient FE simulation is compared to that of the traditional multibody approach 2008;Xiao et al, 2014) in Fig. 28, for which a corrugation with a wavelength of 80 mm and a depth of d m =0.18 mm is considered at 500 km/h.…”
Section: Comparison With the Multi-body Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A cross-wind with exciting frequency can act on vehicles due to railside structures that are repeatedly placed, as in Figure 3, when running on a bridge. However, the theoretical derailment equations due to cross-wind in the previous studies could only statically evaluate the derailment risk under a constant wind speed condition [10,19], and the fluctuant wind or gust conditions have been evaluated using a multibody dynamics simulation [15,16,20]. In this paper, a theoretical formula on the risk of derailment was derived considering cross-winds with varying wind forces generated by structures displaced at regular intervals on the trackside.…”
Section: Vehicle Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%