2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on the surface energy characteristics of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) films modified by C4F8/O2/Ar plasma treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Surface energy values estimated using the binary mixture method are in reasonable agreement with values reported previously. , For example, Lee et al reported 12.54, 11.05, and 1.49 mN/m for γ S , γ S d , and γ S p , respectively. These values are comparable to those estimated here.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Surface energy values estimated using the binary mixture method are in reasonable agreement with values reported previously. , For example, Lee et al reported 12.54, 11.05, and 1.49 mN/m for γ S , γ S d , and γ S p , respectively. These values are comparable to those estimated here.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…First, the PDMS/OTS@SiO 2 based surface has excellent superhydrophobicity, large WCA, low surface energy, and low surface roughness. The large WCA leads to smaller contact area between water droplets and the surface, reducing the heat transfer rate between the cold surface and water droplets. , This also leads to a reduction in the contact area between the ice and the surface, thereby improving the anti-icing performance and reducing ice adhesion. The lower surface energy results in smaller van der Waals forces between the ice and the surface, resulting in lower ice adhesion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lower surface energy (1.4 mN/m) of OTS@SiO 2 was also key role for the above result compared to that (11.0 mN/m) of pure PDMS. 31,32 Although the PDMS/ SiO 2 based surface had a roughness similar to that of the SiO 2 based surface, it yet showed a larger WCA and a smaller SA. These results could be attributed to the synergistic effect of the soft PDMS microspheres and stiff OTS@SiO 2 nanoparticles.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a given final temperature (here 4 °C), we found t i to increase from ∼35 s on plasma-treated glass (contact angle ≈ 8°) to ∼80 s on polycarbonate PC (contact angle ≈ 75°) and finally to ∼650 s on PDMS (contact angle ≈ 107°). The corresponding total surface free energy values reported in the literature are included in Figure c as a reference; see Figure SI3 for comparison of the impacts of polar and nonpolar surface energy contributions. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%