2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0730-725x(02)00594-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on the variations of the apparent diffusion coefficient in areas of solid tumor in high grade gliomas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our quantitative measurements of ADC values for normal brain and gliomas are within the wide range of those reported in previous studies (8–11, 13, 22, 23). Differences in the ADC values are caused to some extent by the different imaging techniques used.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Our quantitative measurements of ADC values for normal brain and gliomas are within the wide range of those reported in previous studies (8–11, 13, 22, 23). Differences in the ADC values are caused to some extent by the different imaging techniques used.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Our results are consistent with Castillo (35), who found that the ADC values helped to distinguish high-grade glioma from normal tissue but could not be used to separate highgrade glioma from surrounding edema. Other studies (28,(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40) have reported that high-grade tumors have significantly lower ADC values than low-grade and benign tumors and that peritumoral ADC is significantly higher in low-grade than in high-grade astrocytomas. In cases where the minimum ADC was considered, it was lower in high-grade gliomas than in the low-grade gliomas and appeared to be correlated well with tumor cellularity (26).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Other studies have reported improved differentiation of intra‐tumoral and peri‐tumoral tissue types by the application of supervised classification methods to MP‐MRI data . Although the spatial heterogeneity of HGGs can be partially explained by the presence of different stages of the disease throughout the lesion , it can also be attributed to the co‐existence of several intra‐tumoral tissue types within the same region, such as the presence of focal necrosis within viable tumor tissue , tumor infiltration in peri‐tumoral edema and the formation of vasogenic edema in the viable tumor region . Therefore, the characterization of tumoral and peri‐tumoral tissue might benefit from a model that incorporates the concept of tissue mixtures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%