2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.optcom.2019.05.060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on water-assisted laser ablation mechanism based on water layer characteristics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Water is most commonly used as a laser ablation assisting liquid since it is cheap, harmless, and recyclable [ 20 , 28 ]. Water can be introduced into the ablation zone in multiple ways: by submerging the workpiece into standing [ 22 , 26 , 29 , 30 ] or flowing water [ 20 , 21 , 31 , 32 ]; by guiding a laser beam in the water jet [ 33 , 34 ]; or by spraying water mist [ 18 ] or a water jet [ 19 , 28 ] next to the laser beam. Most studies have investigated laser ablation with workpieces submerged into a standing or low-velocity liquid flow with a liquid layer thickness of a few to tens of millimetres.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Water is most commonly used as a laser ablation assisting liquid since it is cheap, harmless, and recyclable [ 20 , 28 ]. Water can be introduced into the ablation zone in multiple ways: by submerging the workpiece into standing [ 22 , 26 , 29 , 30 ] or flowing water [ 20 , 21 , 31 , 32 ]; by guiding a laser beam in the water jet [ 33 , 34 ]; or by spraying water mist [ 18 ] or a water jet [ 19 , 28 ] next to the laser beam. Most studies have investigated laser ablation with workpieces submerged into a standing or low-velocity liquid flow with a liquid layer thickness of a few to tens of millimetres.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies have investigated laser ablation with workpieces submerged into a standing or low-velocity liquid flow with a liquid layer thickness of a few to tens of millimetres. The key limitations of such a design were noted in [ 20 , 28 , 35 ]: laser heating formed bubbles around the ablation zone, generating waves at the surface of the liquid. Consequently, waves caused instability in laser processing conditions—variations in laser focus position, beam diffraction, and refraction angles; as a result, hampering the continuity and uniformity of ablated grooves [ 35 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lower effective glass-cutting speed in water at t = 110 µm (compared to cutting in ambient air) could be affected by the laser fluence loss in water (laser beam reflections, distortion, scattering, absorption in the water layer), and also due to the increased glass cooling effect in the ablation zone [ 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 ]. At greater depths in water, steeper cut walls and flatter groove bottoms mitigated efficiency losses in water.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the waterjet is disturbed during machining due to the splashing of debris. Moreover, waterjet-guided laser machining equipment is generally expensive and has high maintenance costs, which limits the application of this technology in the manufacturing industry [ 25 ]. To avoid these problems, Madhukar and Mullick et al [ 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 ] proposed a coaxial waterjet-assisted laser machining method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%