2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.apor.2017.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on wave-induced setup over fringing reefs in the presence of a reef crest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
6

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
7
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…As for the effect of reefcrest width (Fig. 12d), although the presence of a reef crest is reported to be an important factor affecting the wind wave transformation over fringing reefs (e.g., Yao et al, 2017), it seems to have little impact on the solitary wave run-up under both h r ; a slight decline of R could only be found under crest widths larger than 0.4. This is because the solitary wave is very long compared to the reef-crest width; thus most of its energy could transmit over the narrow reef crest.…”
Section: Effects Of Reef Morphology Variations On the Solitary Wave Rmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…As for the effect of reefcrest width (Fig. 12d), although the presence of a reef crest is reported to be an important factor affecting the wind wave transformation over fringing reefs (e.g., Yao et al, 2017), it seems to have little impact on the solitary wave run-up under both h r ; a slight decline of R could only be found under crest widths larger than 0.4. This is because the solitary wave is very long compared to the reef-crest width; thus most of its energy could transmit over the narrow reef crest.…”
Section: Effects Of Reef Morphology Variations On the Solitary Wave Rmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…As for the effect of reef-crest width (Fig. 11d), although the presence of a reef crest is reported to be an important factor affecting the wind wave transformation over fringing reefs (e.g., Yao et al, 2017), it seems to have little impact on the solitary wave runup under both r h , slight decline of R could only be found under the crest width larger than 0.4. This is because the solitary wave is very long compared to the reef-crest width, thus most of its energy could transmit over the narrow reef crest.…”
Section: Effects Of Reef Morphology Variations On the Solitary Wave Rmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…原型进行概化, 开展了一系列的物理模型试验研究, 如Gerritsen [1] 关于檀香山Ala Moana礁, Seelig [8] 针对 关岛附近岸礁, Nelson和Lesleighter [9] 关于大堡礁航 道附近礁坪, Jensen [10] 针对马尔代夫的Male岛, Gourlay [11] 关于大堡礁的Hayman岛, Gourlay [12] 、柳淑学等 人 [13,14] 和Yao等人 [15,16] 关于理想礁体等开展的礁坪上 http://engine.scichina.com/doi/10.1360/N972017-01049 论 文 波浪破碎、 波浪增水和波生流的试验研究. Gourlay [17] 比较了上述部分物模试验的礁体形状、 水文条件和试 [17,18] 应用波能流守恒定律分别给出了岸礁(礁坪后 方接岸)和台礁上(礁坪后方是泻湖或开放水域)波浪 增水的计算公式, 其中由波浪破碎导致的波能损耗 由 Longuet-Higgins和 Stewart [19] [12,17] .75 s处.…”
Section: 自20世纪80年代开始 学者们对不同的珊瑚礁unclassified
“…虽然本试验地形坡度与Gourlay [12] 相同, 但是斜坡 前水深差别很大, 本实验礁体前水深大于1.8 m, 而 Gourlay [12] 礁体前最大水深仅为0.42 m, 其他研究的试 Figure 7 (Color online) The relationship between the maximum wave set-up and the various wave conditions. The maximum wave set-up versus incident wave heights (a), versus incident wave periods (b), versus submerged depths (c) 论 文 表 3 所有入射波况下礁坪上最大增水 Table 3 The maximum wave set-up over the reef-top under the all wave conditions 验条件(如Gerritsen [1] , Seelig [8] , Nelson和Lesleighter [9] , Gourlay [11] , Yao等人 [15,16] )也远小于深水波条件. 这 导致波浪行进到礁面上时的入、反射波相位不同、波 浪变形形态也不相同, 所以本试验相近波况的波浪破 碎位置和破碎波高与Gourlay [12] 也不同, 由此可以解…”
Section: 自20世纪80年代开始 学者们对不同的珊瑚礁unclassified