2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.saa.2021.119998
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study the interaction between juglone and calf thymus DNA by spectroscopic and molecular docking techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Juglone contains a phenol hydroxyl group as hydrogen bond donor and two carbonyl groups as hydrogen bond acceptors. 38,39 SA was selected as a binder because it also contains many oxygencontaining functional groups, such as carbonyl groups and a hydroxyl group, which could form hydrogen bonds to promote noncovalent interactions with juglone. 40,41 In the FTIR spectrum of J-SA composites, a red shift of the CO stretching from 1642 (J) to 1628 cm −1 (J-SA) indicated a strong hydrogen bond interaction between juglone and SA; additionally, the disappearance of the deformation peak of pyranose rings (1289 cm −1 ) also indicated the existence of hydrogen bonding between juglone and SA (Figure 2f).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Juglone contains a phenol hydroxyl group as hydrogen bond donor and two carbonyl groups as hydrogen bond acceptors. 38,39 SA was selected as a binder because it also contains many oxygencontaining functional groups, such as carbonyl groups and a hydroxyl group, which could form hydrogen bonds to promote noncovalent interactions with juglone. 40,41 In the FTIR spectrum of J-SA composites, a red shift of the CO stretching from 1642 (J) to 1628 cm −1 (J-SA) indicated a strong hydrogen bond interaction between juglone and SA; additionally, the disappearance of the deformation peak of pyranose rings (1289 cm −1 ) also indicated the existence of hydrogen bonding between juglone and SA (Figure 2f).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… FTIR analysis was used to confirm hydrogen bond formation between juglone and SA. Juglone contains a phenol hydroxyl group as hydrogen bond donor and two carbonyl groups as hydrogen bond acceptors. , SA was selected as a binder because it also contains many oxygen-containing functional groups, such as carbonyl groups and a hydroxyl group, which could form hydrogen bonds to promote noncovalent interactions with juglone. , In the FTIR spectrum of J-SA composites, a red shift of the CO stretching from 1642 (J) to 1628 cm –1 (J-SA) indicated a strong hydrogen bond interaction between juglone and SA; additionally, the disappearance of the deformation peak of pyranose rings (1289 cm –1 ) also indicated the existence of hydrogen bonding between juglone and SA (Figure f). To further excavate the interactions between juglone and sodium alginate, density functional theory (DFT) simulations based on Gaussian 09 were performed . The optimized structures between juglone and sodium alginate were shown in Figure g, and the calculation results were shown in Figure S6.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The binding mode between complex and BSA by comparing the value and the sign of thermodynamic parameters [ 83 ] could be deduced as electrostatic interactions, van der Waals forces, and hydrogen bonding or hydrophobic interactions. Equations and [ 84 ] are used: italicln()K2K1goodbreak=()1T1goodbreak−1T2ΔHR0.25em ΔGgoodbreak=ΔHgoodbreak−TΔSgoodbreak=goodbreak−RTlnK where K 1 , K 2 = the binding constants at T 1 , T 2 , respectively, ΔH = enthalpy changes, ΔG = the free energy change, ΔS = entropy changes, and R = the gas constant.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The binding mode between complex and BSA by comparing the value and the sign of thermodynamic parameters [83] could be deduced as electrostatic interactions, van der Waals forces, and hydrogen bonding or hydrophobic interactions. Equations 4 and 5 [84] are used: ln…”
Section: Thermodynamic Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, drugs that interact with DNA in vivo can also interact outside the human body [9], so the mechanism of action of both occurring in vivo can be predicted by studying the interaction between DNA and drugs in vitro. In practical studies, researchers prefer to use calf thymus DNA (ctDNA) instead of human DNA for experiments, which is attributed to the easy availability of ctDNA and its close structural similarity to mammalian DNA [10]. In this paper, we have studied and analyzed the interaction mechanism between BENDA and ctDNA using UV-vis, Confocal Raman spectroscopy and Molecular docking, and analyzed the interaction pattern and binding sites in detail at the single molecule level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%