2013
DOI: 10.1111/vde.12024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study to assessin vitroantimicrobial activity of nine ear cleaners against 50Malassezia pachydermatisisolates

Abstract: Ear cleaners with activity against Malassezia may help to reduce the unnecessary use of antibiotic-containing polypharmaceutical ear medications. This study shows that the use of a large number of isolates may provide a more accurate account of the in vitro activity of a product.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(116 reference statements)
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With respect to prevention of recurrent Malassezia otitis, while studies in vitro have demonstrated antimicrobial efficacy of ear cleaners, there are only two studies examining topical therapy for prevention of Malassezia otitis. A single study examining dogs with recurrent allergic otitis showed a favourable outcome to a once weekly ear cleaner containing chloroxylenol and cerumenolytics (Epiotic, Virbac Carros, France) and concurrent twice weekly three drops per ear of 0.0584% topical hydrocortisone aceponate solution (Cortavance, VIRBAC SA, Carros, France) (95% chance of remaining free of relapse at day 180) compared with weekly ear cleaner alone (50% chance of remaining infection free at day 180) .…”
Section: Prevention Of Malassezia‐associated Skin Diseases In Dogs Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With respect to prevention of recurrent Malassezia otitis, while studies in vitro have demonstrated antimicrobial efficacy of ear cleaners, there are only two studies examining topical therapy for prevention of Malassezia otitis. A single study examining dogs with recurrent allergic otitis showed a favourable outcome to a once weekly ear cleaner containing chloroxylenol and cerumenolytics (Epiotic, Virbac Carros, France) and concurrent twice weekly three drops per ear of 0.0584% topical hydrocortisone aceponate solution (Cortavance, VIRBAC SA, Carros, France) (95% chance of remaining free of relapse at day 180) compared with weekly ear cleaner alone (50% chance of remaining infection free at day 180) .…”
Section: Prevention Of Malassezia‐associated Skin Diseases In Dogs Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, Mason et al . ). Whilst it is difficult to conclude the exact reason for the extent of in vitro activity of the ear cleaners tested because they varied widely in their ingredients, there are components of many of them with proven antiyeast activity.…”
Section: Topical Therapy To Manage Secondary Causes Of Otitismentioning
confidence: 97%
“…, Mason et al . ). Parachlorometaxylenol (PCMX), a component of many ear cleaners, is also suggested to confer antiyeast activity (Lloyd & Lamport , Reme et al .…”
Section: Topical Therapy To Manage Secondary Causes Of Otitismentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most products contain one or more ingredients with antimicrobial activity and other components such as ceruminolytics, astringents, stabilisers and surfactants, which increase the solubility and activity of the antiseptic. A number of studies have reported antibacterial and antifungal activity of commercial ear cleaners or their components (Lloyd et al 1998, Cole et al 2003, Rème et al 2006, Swinney et al 2008, Guardabassi et al 2010, Mason et al 2013, Chan et al 2019, but most of these studies are in vitro while in vivo assays are few and far between.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%