2017
DOI: 10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20175492
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study to compare between paperless partogram and modified who partogram in management of labour

Abstract: Background: Partogram is being used since 1954 when Friedman described it for monitoring progress of labour. The Paperless Partogram proposed by Dr. Debdas is a low-skill method for detection of abnormal labour. The main aim of the study is to know efficacy and user friendliness   of paperless partogram in comparison with WHO partogram in monitoring and management of labour.Methods: It’s a prospective observational study conducted at Vanivilas hospital where 200 women in labour were included. 6 resident doctor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other studies showed similar results, Deka et al 7 found vaginal delivery in 88.5% (Group I) and 85% (Group II). In study by Veena et al 9 this proportion was 79% and 85% in Group I and II respectively and by Akhtar et al 5 it was 93.5% and 94% respectively. There was no statistical significance in the number of normal vaginal deliveries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other studies showed similar results, Deka et al 7 found vaginal delivery in 88.5% (Group I) and 85% (Group II). In study by Veena et al 9 this proportion was 79% and 85% in Group I and II respectively and by Akhtar et al 5 it was 93.5% and 94% respectively. There was no statistical significance in the number of normal vaginal deliveries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…73% patients delivered before the alert line in group I and 69% delivered before alert ETD in group II which as similar to Bhuvaneshwari et al 8 where 77% and 72% delivered before alert line/ETD with no statistical significance. Veena et al 9 showed 76% and 83% patients delivering before alert ETD/line in group I and group II respectively. Akhtar et al 5 observed the highest rate of normal progression of labour with 88.5% (Group I) and 87.5% (Group II) delivering before the expected time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Electronic partographs also result in a significant reduction in the rate of prolonged labor from 42% to 29% and have a far greater usage rate than paper-based partographs [21]. In addition, electronic partographs are preferred over paper-based partographs by clinicians due to their ease of use and less time, improved performance, decreased referral rates, assured prompt referral when necessary, facilitation of reporting obligations, and enhancement of service quality [26,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%