2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2021.101586
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studying caregiver-infant co-regulation in dynamic, diverse cultural contexts: A call to action

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 139 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is possible that caregiver unpredictability and its impact on development might vary as a function of the particular caregiver behaviors being considered and the valence of such behaviors. Davis' pioneering observational work on caregiver unpredictability (Davis et al, 2017) has exclusively centered on sensory inputs to the infant (e.g., touch or vocalizations), which are not equivalent to or interchangeable with other inputs, such as caregivers' emotional expressions or responses to infants' bids or needs (Buhler-Wassmann & Hibel, 2021). Researchers have not yet considered whether caregiver unpredictability is domain-general, expressed similarly across different inputs or features of caregiving, or domain-specific, evident in specific inputs or valences.…”
Section: Issue #2 Domains and Specificity Of Caregiver Unpredictabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible that caregiver unpredictability and its impact on development might vary as a function of the particular caregiver behaviors being considered and the valence of such behaviors. Davis' pioneering observational work on caregiver unpredictability (Davis et al, 2017) has exclusively centered on sensory inputs to the infant (e.g., touch or vocalizations), which are not equivalent to or interchangeable with other inputs, such as caregivers' emotional expressions or responses to infants' bids or needs (Buhler-Wassmann & Hibel, 2021). Researchers have not yet considered whether caregiver unpredictability is domain-general, expressed similarly across different inputs or features of caregiving, or domain-specific, evident in specific inputs or valences.…”
Section: Issue #2 Domains and Specificity Of Caregiver Unpredictabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Critically, EMA studies also allow researchers to document the processes by which mood and emotion may fluctuate over time (Ebner-Priemer & Trull, 2009). Research designs that combine mood reports with objective measures of experience can be used to test theories of real-time effects of everyday contexts on mental health (Buhler-Wassmann & Hibel, 2021; Hamaker & Wichers, 2017; Shiffman et al, 2008). For example, time-varying measures of crying exposure can be time-locked to self-report surveys to assess lagged associations between infant crying and maternal mental health.…”
Section: The Current Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frequently, the impact of maternal care on the infant and the degree of parental co-regulation is subtle, with its impact becoming visible with removal or dramatic changes in parental care. For example, young children can maintain homeostasis of vital functions, such as heart rate and respiration, but the regulatory role of parental care was shown through experiments comparing infants alone v. engaged in parental contact via somatosensory (temperature, touch), olfactory (caregiver odor), visual (face), and auditory (voice) stimulation ( Kommers et al, 2019 ; Suga et al, 2019 ; Buhler-Wassmann and Hibel, 2021 ; Ionio et al, 2021 ). This regulation is also seen in the infant’s co-sleep with the parent, producing improved sleep compared to when the infants sleep alone ( Mosko et al, 1997 ; Richard and Mosko, 2004 ; Waynforth, 2020 ; Yoshida and Funato, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In children, regular disruption of emotional homeostasis during early life (i.e., through adverse rearings such as deprivation or maltreatment) is highly correlated with later-life compromised functioning (i.e., psychiatric disorders, impaired academics, etc. ), although specific causal mechanisms embedded within the infant-caregiver relationship have remained elusive ( Raineki et al, 2012 ; Buhler-Wassmann and Hibel, 2021 ). The lack of understanding specific infant self-regulatory and co-regulatory mechanisms, such as specific parental behavior or sensory stimuli necessary and causal for infant physiological and emotional homeostasis, has hampered our understanding of the correlational link between infant dysregulation and later-life compromised outcome ( Tronick et al, 1977 ; Feldman et al, 2002 ; Raposo et al, 2014 ; Cevasco-Trotter et al, 2019 ; Palacios-Barrios and Hanson, 2019 ; Tottenham, 2020 ; Vink et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%